3/4 Sized? 1956 Chevrolet Bel Air Shorty

It’s hard to imagine an auto line-up from the ’50s with more iconic lines than the tri-five Chevrolets, with arguably, a styling improvement progressing from 1955 through 1957.  That being the case, why take a ’56 Bel Air and hack out the middle, thereby bestowing it with the punitive name of “shorty”? Because you could? Maybe, who knows for sure but here’s just such an example to examine, and maybe the question will be answered. This creation is located in Buckeye, Arizona, and is available, here on craigslist for $9,800. Thanks to Pat L. for this tip!

This custom has a lean listing. You always want to know a little back story or what drove the motivation to conduct such an undertaking. And this custom was no mean feat, it’s a lot of measuring, cutting, welding, reinforcing, etc. Was it worth the effort? Well if you enjoy the fruits of your labor, absolutely! If you decide to part with your creation, and it’s in hot demand, then yes again. Otherwise, you’re stuck with your effort and perhaps the nagging, “Why did I do this?” thought.

While this shorty isn’t for me, I really admire the metalwork. My metalworking skills would probably stop at about the level necessary to concoct a crude looking still, and I actually worked in a body shop at one-time, so I truly admire the effort. The C-pillar treatment, and its integration into the rear window, is really well-done. Styling cues like that take a lot of imagination as there really isn’t an existing template that can be plagiarized. The simple orange finish is in good condition, with some depth but not a great shine. The chrome, bumpers, etc., looks a bit thin, they’re totally presentable, just old. Where things don’t really work well is when you view this Chevy in profile, it just doesn’t flow properly. And I don’t think it’s because there is a nagging image of an unaltered ’56 Bel Air in my consciousness, it just looks off. That said, there are no obvious body scars or misfit panels so thumbs up overall.

Under the non-altered hood is a Chevy small-block motor, one of over 100M produced since 1955. But which one? The seller doesn’t elaborate, but he does state, “Fresh V8 with aluminum intake and Edelbrock 4bbl HEI Ignition, dual exhaust, Fresh Powerglide automatic transmission runs drives good.” The Powerglide, IMHO, is a poor choice, especially when there are so many better alternatives available. Considering everything that has been done to this Chevy, a better transmission would have been a small item.

The interior is pretty fair, a repainted dash, bucket seats coopted from somewhere, auxillary gauges added and good carpet in place. The door cards are home made and cheesy looking but that’s a minor matter. The B&M style racing shifter, with the aforementiond Powerglide, looks out of place. And yes, I know heavily modified PG’s are used in top-fuel drag racing but that hardly describes this car’s station in life. What I would like to see is how the interior C-pillars are finished, unfortunately no images are included.

Cool? Yes in an endearing sort of way but I bet the appeal is very limited. What do you think, good alternative to a full-sized ’56, or OK in its own right?

WANT ADS

WANTED 67-69 Chevrolet Camaro Looking for an affordable Camaro in need of resto. Something with a solid frame and cowl. Thanks. Contact

WANTED 1973 Plymouth 340 Duster Looking for a 1973 Plymouth Duster, 4 speed, with factory sunroof. Any condition in the East Coast. Contact

WANTED 1979 Subaru DL Looking for a 1979 Subaru 4 door DL, blue with blue interior, automatic. Good/excellent condition. Contact

WANTED 1965-1985 Chrysler Fullsize Roadtrip car for crazy swede Nice original fullsize US car, up for a 5000 mile trip. Max 10 k USD. Contact

WANTED 1994/95 Dodge Dakota 4X4 Looking for a nice ’94/’95 Dakota 4WD in nice shape.Want a V8. Contact

Submit Your Want Ad

Comments

  1. Joe Daniels

    Well, it was just a 4-door anyway, so I guess it was better than crushing it.

    Like 2
  2. 73 AMX

    I guess a guess a guy could get some usable parts from it for a real 56

    Like 6
  3. John Wilburn

    If you’re going to ruin the car, at least put a V6 in it to match the shortened look.

    Like 4
  4. sign guy

    Can’t help but wonder why they put a dinosaur on the roof for a couple of the pictures.

    Like 1
  5. carl pederson

    My vote for the ugliest car of the year for 2020

    Like 7
  6. Chuck

    Unless all the trim has been changed out this is not a Bel Air probably a 210.

    Like 2
  7. steve flynn

    nice garage… :)

    Like 4
  8. Steve R

    I like how the fuel cell is held in place with water heater straps. If that’s any indication of the quality of the workmanship that went into this car it’s a hard pass. Of course, the sellers of these monstrosity’s never show what’s really important, how the frame was spliced together. There is a reason for that. Another thing to consider, even when these cars were being built, nobody hacked up a nice car to make one of these.

    Steve R

    Like 6
    • grant

      Those aren’t even water heater straps. It’s just p-tape. Yikes. If you have this around your water heater you should go to home depot and get real straps, btw.

  9. Paul L Windish

    Any truth to the rumor the current owner has a red ball nose, baggy clothes and way over sized shoes? CLOWN CAR.

    Like 5
  10. Doc

    Lord. W T F

    Like 1
  11. Russ Ashley

    From the comments it seems that most here feel the same as I do about shortened vehicles. I don’t remember ever seeing a shortened vehicle that didn’t look out of proportion, and this one is no exception.

    Like 5
  12. Jeff

    What can I say that has not already been said?
    Ho Hum….

    Like 1
  13. Joe Btfsplk

    This car would look much better as a roadster.

    Like 1
  14. angliagt angliagt Member

    Could this PLEASE be the end of shortened vehicles
    on this site? PLEASE!!!

    Like 4
  15. Phlathead Phil

    The ONLY thing missing is a porthole window.

    I knew a guy in H.S. That took a hacksaw to a perfectly good ‘55 Bel-Aire. Yes, it was now a convertible, but at the 40th Reunion, he was STILL kicking himself for doing that.

    Oh, well…

    Like 1
  16. Tirefriar

    Why?

    Like 2
  17. Ian C

    I remember submitting this one last year, so I looked back to see if the price/location were different. No mention of price in the last write up. Anyone have a better memory than me? (not that it would take much)

    • Jim ODonnell Staff

      Ian:

      Thanks for the note, you did in November 2019. I generally don’t like to cover items that have already been published before, and had I known about the prior post, I would have passed on covering it again. The last time, “shorty” was located in Las Vegas and listed on craigslist and you’re right, no price was referenced.

      I gather our readers aren’t a fan of these – I get it.

      JO

      Like 1
      • Ian C

        No big deal at all. It is kind of interesting to see if some of these have changed after a new owner takes possession.

        As far as people complaining about them… I am not a fan of many shorty’s, but some are interesting. Like the dually Suburban or ’65 ElCamino that were featured here in the past. Someone is going to complain about every car featured. When I see something that I don’t like, I scroll to the next one. I know it is a bizarre concept, but it works for me. I think all of the writers are doing a great job!!

        Like 3
  18. lary waldman

    Is there a good idea for a shortened vehicle ? Perhaps a 12 cyl. Volkswagen Phaeton built by Bentley for Volkswagen. It is just a thought!

Leave a Reply to carl pederson Cancel reply

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Keep me in the conversation via email. Or subscribe without commenting.