Choose Your Motor: 1977 Porsche 911S Coupe

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

One could hope that a partially disassembled Porsche 911 would open the door for the average guy to craft a car he’d always dreamed of, imprinted with the legacy of one of the greatest sports cars ever to hit the road. Here on eBay is just such a car – a rustless, motorless, sunroof-less 1977 Porsche 911S coupe, ready for your build. The car currently sits in Eugene, Oregon, and it is bid to $15,100 reserve not met, with a $33k buy-it-now price. Over at the dealer’s website, it’s listed at $32,500. The eBay verbiage indicates the seller is serious about finding a buyer, and he offers up a few engines to pave the way. Let’s see if this car is a good value, or if we ought to keep shopping.

It’s not entirely true that the car is motorless. If the sale is consummated near the buy-it-now price, the seller will include a non-numbers-matching, disassembled 2.7-liter and a year-appropriate 915 gearbox, bench-tested and ready to go. But that’s not all! If the 165 hp 2.7 is too pedestrian, the seller offers a 3.0-liter SC engine – disassembled but good for 204 hp once it’s built – and if you want to go all-out, there’s a race-bred 3.2-liter that’s on its way to 3.3 liters with 100 mm cylinders. The car’s CDI box, axles, oil tank, fuel system, and wiring harness are present. The G-series cars wore the safety bumpers inflicted on most cars by US regulations in 1974. The Ice Green Metallic paint appears to be in driver-condition, with nicks and fading evident. The chassis has traveled 156,000 miles.

The interior is a mixed bag. The dash is cracked, the front seats don’t match, the door panels should be cork rather than black, the rear seating area has carpet sort of installed, and the headliner is not torn but it is dirty. The seller notes that the windows are wind-up, not power. On the other hand, this color is a great match for the exterior, and in the world of Porsche collectors, unusual colors are all the rage right now.

Several underside photos support the claim of a mostly rust-free, mostly straight example. The hood is either not fully latched in this photo, or it doesn’t fit correctly, and the front valence has met a curb sometime in its life. The driver’s side floor pan is clean when viewed from the inside, as is the trunk. So is this price reasonable? The market for 911s is tricky. If we stay with the G-series – forgetting all those wildly expensive early cars, special models, and so forth – we find very original, low-mileage cars selling for premium prices, such as this one from Bonham’s last year.  But here is a driver-quality ’77 that underwent a color change and couldn’t find a home for $40k. Meanwhile, the right engine/backdate/cosmetics combination can send prices well into six figures. In my calculus, if I can buy a driver that runs and isn’t falling apart for somewhere in the $40k area, that makes $33k for this one feel steep – but what do you think?

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. bobhess bobhessMember

    If an engine and transmission are included it still isn’t worth the asking price. Plain Jane car with semi lousy interior and paint, a do it your self engine choice in pieces and none matching. What could possibly be right with that picture?

    Like 7
    • Michelle RandAuthor

      I agree. It’s going to be a tough sell until this guys puts the car together himself. There’s a lot that needs to be made to work with the new motor. Some folks are going to get stars in their eyes about a G50/3.2 conversion but THAT’s a trick and a half.

      Like 7
    • Dale Darnell

      You are 100 percent correct way over price for qhat you are getting.

      Like 1
  2. Steve R

    This car was featured last week, the seller just rolled it outside to take the pictures.

    Steve R

    Like 2
  3. CCFisher

    The unusual colors and “slicktop” roof will undoubtedly appeal to the Porsche faithful, but the lack of the original engine will temper their enthusiasm a bit.

    Like 4
  4. Rob

    I’m pretty sure the 3.0 SC motor put out 180 HP because I owned a 1980 SC and that’s what it was rated for. There was some sort of non-US mod that got to 200 HP, but most cars didn’t have it.

    The 2.7 motor had the stud problem, and was probably the worst motor of the series (991 garbage excluded).

    Like 2
  5. Tbone

    Needs an LS

    Like 1
  6. FrankD

    Someone pinch the owner to wake him up. You want how much?

    Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Barn Finds