As one goes, so does the other, or at least that’s how Ford and Chevrolet used to duke it out with each other. And that’s the case with Ford’s Ranchero vs. Chevrolet’s El Camino, such as this 1964 example – the Ranchero bested the Camino by two model years, so Chevrolet had to play catch-up. Things morphed for both manufacturers, and today’s Bakersfield, California discovery is a first-year example of the gen-two El Camino. It has undergone some modifications, so let’s check it out. Interested buyers will find it here on craigslist where it’s available for $17,500.
Ford’s Ranchero was probably a surprise for many when it debuted in the ’57 model year. The concept of a car/truck “utility” or “Ute” as it is called in Australia, existed down under for some time, and Ford thought it a marketable design for U.S. tastes. Chevrolet followed suit in ’59 but let it go after two short model years. In 1960, Ford saw reason to downsize their Ranchero from the full-size Galaxie-based platform to their new compact Falcon (21K units). Chevrolet? They got nuthin’. They continued with the full-size B-body Camino through ’60 (14K copies – a 36% drop over ’59) and then let it go. If they saw downsizing as Ford did, as the way forward, they had no useable platform until the A-body Chevelle was introduced in ’64. And voila`, our subject truck was born.
To state the obvious, this Chevy has been lowered and painted in a non-original shade—yes, it’s quite—blue. The seller refers to the finish as “decent,” but it looks pretty good. It’s wearing later-introduced rally wheels capped off with ’67-only vintage center caps. The cargo bed is in nice shape, and the deck has been sprayed with a thick protective coat.
Offered originally with two different six-cylinder engines, two different 283 CI V8s, and at mid-year, a 327 CI V8 option, the powertrain of this Chevy is now what is often referred to as a 350/350 – a 350 CI V8 engine and a Turbo-Hydramatic 350, three-speed automatic transmission. It’s a prevalent swap as the components are still manufactured today, are relatively inexpensive, and, in this case, a complete bolt-in swap. The engine is wearing the usual suspects of an open-element air cleaner, aluminum intake manifold, Holley carburetor, and headers. Other observed upgrades include an aluminum radiator and a dual-circuit master cylinder – constantly a welcome change. The seller refers to this truck as a “nice driver“.
Speaking of niceties, the seller uses that same descriptor for the interior. The bench seat environment reveals a clean, compact space that has been reupholstered with non-original-style fabric. Beyond that, it’s very stock, revealing only a more modern replacement radio. The entire shebang is fine, and I’d suggest it needs no attention.
Virtually every Gen-One (’64-’67) or Gen-Two (’68-’72) Camino I discover has been modded from mild to wild. Most are like this ’64—just pleasantly upgraded, and these ’64s seem to be found the least often. I prefer the Gen-Two, but this would be one to consider if one were in the El Camino market, wouldn’t you agree?
I would agree. Nice truck here. Not that l don’t like modified stuff or anything….
I’m normally a fan of the sleeper look, but on this El Camino it just looks cheap. First thing I would do with it is paint the wheels silver (argent) and add trim rings, or ditch the wheels altogether in favor of a set of 17″, chrome American Racing Torq-Thrust M wheels.
This thing gives caminos a bad name!
Why??? Al
15 in. Torq thrust or Radirs,17 in. and up don’t belong on vintage rides,IMHO.
Buy it, raise it and drive it. Paint it later maybe.
Always a favorite year El Camino here.
Love these, My first car, 1964 283 3 on the tree, RootBeer Brown !
Petty blue looks surprisingly good on a Chevy
Put this blue on a Cadillac,Escalade,navigator or most other cars and it looks cheap put on white,black,red,burgundy and look at the difference!
Lowered.
Meh.
Jim..
For the record.. this is a 2nd gen El Camino.
1959-1960 1st gen
1964-1967 2nd gen
1968-1973 3rd gen
1974-1977 4th gen
1978-1987 5th gen
Right! I forgot about the ‘59-‘60 by accident (on purpose).
JO
3rd gen was 68-72.
GOT ME.. You are correct
My Dad had a 65 El Camino that with stock suspension sat about the same height as this one. His was a sleeper though, original paint and wheels, but it had a built small block pushing 450hp. and a Muncie 4 speed.
I like Elco’s, i have a 70. The almost Ford Grabber Blue or American Motors Big Bad Blue just doesn’t work on this truck. Agree on the rallys, back to Argent and add the trim rings. All in all, not bad, the bed has definitely had some use, but that is a good thing as you can use it as it was intended.
El Caminos gen 2 and up came with factory rear air shocks
I sure wish I had bought one of these when they were affordable. (’64-’72)
Freaking awesome!