From the pictures, this Chevelle listed on craigslist appears to be a nice car at a reasonable price. It has too many doors for some and the six cylinder engine with an automatic is only a placeholder for an LS engine and a 4 speed, but it appears to be a really nice low mileage car. The 26,000 mile claim is hard to believe, of course, but it was last registered 37 years ago, so it’s possibly correct. It’s had the necessary mechanical work performed, so it runs and drives. The asking price is $6,500. Thanks to Rocco B. for this great submission.
The interior looks really nice. The steering wheel looks a bit worn, casting doubt on the 26,000 claim though.
This Chevelle certainly looks nice in the few pictures in the ad, doesn’t it? With the hood is open, you have to wonder why the seller wouldn’t provide a picture of the engine or of the front and back of this Chevelle. If it is really as nice as the pictures, it is an amazing survivor. If it has really lived and was stored in the desert, it would likely be rust free. Given the wear on the steering wheel though, this Malibu has likely covered a lot more than 26,000, wouldn’t you think? Still, don’t you think $6500 is a reasonable price for this Chevelle?
Given that it has great paint, a very nice interior, a thrifty 6 cylinder, and the comfort of easy 4 door access, no, it is not worth it…
Nope, not worth it at all…..I’ll give ya 2,000 and I think I’m doing you a favor. Nobody wants 4 doors these days :)
Wrong
Uh I think we do want 4 doors. Who wants to climb behind a seat?
If mine, the 6 cyl. would be pressed into service in lieu of the average, run-of-the-mill, tired, SBC ($@d B@$ic C#evy) swap. Tune-up, fluid, filter and grease job maintenance along with correct bias-ply tire replacement along with a correct front end alignment and i would have daily driver enjoyment.
Yes, a car in this condition, as original as it is, is worth it. And as so few cars like this have survived, it would be criminal to rip out its drivetrain and do a 327/396/427 install as there are thousands of such cars out there already. This is a one-of-a-kind survivor. Enjoy it as is. I’m betting if you show up with one at your local Cars and Coffee it will attract a crowd of admirers who will walk by the six big-block Chevelles at the same show.
Just one man’s opinion, take it for what it’s worth.
I noticed the same thing when I was looking for a 71 RS. The modified ones were a dime a dozen but an unmolested original was tough to find.
I love this car as is, but would love to add period correct A/C.
Mr. Dave Montanbeau SR…..I do believe that you failed to see the sarcasm and or facetiousness of my response to the initial post. In the future, my suggestion would be to read through entirely prior to responding.
Lovely looking car! I’d be happy with a six cylinder engine and automatic transmission
Lovely looking Chevelle. Needs more photos though. The more photos of the car, the better. Inside, outside, bonnet, boot.
It’s what my dad bought my grandma in 1965 – a six/auto and I think he went for air con….it replaced the 53 Belair coupe shortly after gramps passed….would have liked to have either one of them….the 53 or that 65……
A college roommate had one of these in 2-door style, same murky turquoise paint. What a drab car. As the old song says, “Someone gots to love the woman with the skinny legs.”
I like it as is. I’m not a four door man but, it’s still a nice car. I see many people mention the addition of A/C but, for me it would be cruise control. When I hit the highway I want to set it and just guide the car along. Cruise would be a more important upgrade for me.
I agree. I’d keep it as original as possible. I prefer station wagons, but this is nice. The only thing I’d upgrade would be the instrument cluster. Instead of those warning “stupid” lights, I’d have proper needle gauges.
Nobody has mentioned that it is not a Malibu. It’s a Chevelle 300.
Rodent, you’re absolutely right ! It IS a 300 ! Nonetheless, a very nice car. Being such equipped, I would prefer it to have a “three-on-the-tree” Beautiful !
It’s actually a 300 Deluxe. My neighbors had this very car in the same color. The 300 Deluxe had the bottom chrome and that interior where the 300 didn’t have the chrome. See link:
http://www.oldcarbrochures.org/index.php/NA/Chevrolet/1965_Chevrolet/1965-Chevrolet-Chevelle-Brochure/1965-Chevrolet-Chevelle-12-13
I think the mileage is accurate. My late ex-FIL had a ’66 Nova 4 door, very similar to this, and he rarely used it. We have to remember, people didn’t buy cars like this for cross country jaunts ( although, I’m sure many did) These were grandma’s grocery getter, or doctors appt. on the other side of town, and put back in the garage. I agree with Rich, I suppose you could do the fire-breathing engine swap, but you lose the character. THIS is what grandma drove, not some pro stock Chevelle. Super great find.
Definitely not a Malibu.
My parents had a new Malibu spring 1965, 230 I-6 with Powerglide. A little darker turquoise than this one. Malibu’s had a dressier interior, more chrome and Malibu by Chevrolet on the rear flank where this one has a 300. Dad really wanted a BelAir but Mum did not care much for the styling ans spotted the Malibu on the showroom floor, and they bought it on the spot. Ideal sized car for a family of four
Whether it’s a Malibu or a 300, it’s still a nice looking Chevelle. One I’d buy if it were sold in the Seattle area.
Have it transported.
Just beware of glowing aliens in the trunk! :)
https://70srichard.wordpress.com/2014/03/02/repo-man/
RoselandPete……yes sir, you are SOOOO right on the money! Getting to the point anymore that you have to go to an AACA show to see more original or restored vehicles than the shows w/ yet more rods……it’s been getting old already!
1965 is perhaps my favourite year for the Chevelle and Malibu. 4 door is my favourite body style, along with station wagons. The only things I’d upgrade for this car are a 3spd auto, rather than the 2spd auto usually available for GM cars of the decade.