Oh, my. Get a load of this rare and tasty turquoise treat. The seller describes this 1961 Impala SS Bubble Top as “pristine,” and after drooling over the 24 photos included in the ad, I tend to agree. Except for one respray in the ‘80’s, the car is touted as “original with matching numbers, and original sheet metal and glass.” This two-owner time capsule can be found in Lancaster, South Carolina and is for sale here on eBay for $86,995 or best offer.
To many, 1961 was one of GM’s finest styling years across all of their lines (especially Chevrolet with its beautiful V-sculpted rear end and six taillights). The Bow Tie promised to usher in the Kennedy-era New Frontier with a “Trim New Size, Clean New Style, and Fine New Comfort.” And they delivered with 20 new models including this svelte number, the Impala Sports Coupe featuring the new SS optional package. Although the SS package was available on all five Impala lines in 1961, only 493 Impalas in total left the factory with it. I couldn’t find how many of those were Sports Coupes like this one, but you can do the math. This is one rare survivor, especially in its like-new condition.
The seller doesn’t share much about this Impala’s history except that it was bought new in North Carolina where it spent most of its life. The Tropical Turquoise paint looks sea breeze smooth and all the chrome, trim, badging and other SS options, like the full wheel covers with simulated knock off hubs, look great. The restyled ’61 Chevy promoted their cabins as having “rich new fabrics, and bright new colors and patterns along with an exclusive new instrument console.” As the photos reveal, the smart-looking complimenting turquoise interior looks great as well, giving off a vibe of sporty luxury.
Ah, the desirable Bubble Top (or the “canopy roof” as it was called in Chevy’s sales brochure) with its thin A-Pillar and C-Pillar that seamlessly blends into the rounded rear glass. A true work of art. Although two hardtop options were available in ’61, the airy Bubble Top is far more desirable than the more squared off hardtop on the Impala Sports Sedan.
Like the rest of this fine car, the engine bay is extremely clean and tidy. The seller says this SS has the 348-cubic-inch V8 with a four-speed manual transmission with a floor shifter. Its odometer is listed at 27,800. This is a stunning survivor and definitely fits into the “investment” category given its rarity and high price tag. I’ve never seen many ’61 Impala Super Sports at car shows, especially in this color combination. It’s quite an example of one of Chevrolet’s finest hours.
Ron, the first thing I said was “Oh my look at that” when I saw the pic. Same as you. Big smile this morning!
I don’t speak ‘bow tie’, but my favorite Chevy is this model and year, in my favorite color! This is how I would have ordered one in `61. Beautiful.
PS: “Survivor” my foot! A frame-off restoration does NOT a “survivor” make! Nice car and all, but let’s not water down terms on these cars.
I agree, but where did you read “frame-off restoration?”
I agree.
Yes, my favotite too
“$86,995 or best offer.” Better hurry. this is gonna be worth $100,000 in no time.
I don’t doubt that but the one thing that will always hold this car back is that it’s a 348.
The 409 cars will always be the most in demand in the ‘61 SS versions.
It’s sort of like the 1970 Chevelle Super Sports. The 454 is more in demand than the 396.
And as far as that goes with this car, I didn’t see any proof that it is a true SS. No pic of the trim tag, no pic of the engine ledge, no pic of the transmission code. Not even a written list of codes and dates for the car.
I’m just saying when you get into cars in this price range and especially this degree of rarity, documentation is king.
Larry D says it all in three words
DOCUMENTATION IS KING
Amen. Both my First Gen Monte SS’s have build sheets, the Protect-O-Plate, original matching numbers drivetrains, old registrations, license plates, receipts etc.
Better to do your due diligence and get what you’re paying for than be unpleasantly surprised later. Prospective buyers need to understand they absolutely can NOT fall in love with a car based on a handful of pictures.
I know all you guys are gonna think I’m crazy, but my wife is the Original Owner of a ’61 Impala with a 283 & PG. PS, no PB & very little extras. She got it from her parents for High School graduation & I’m sure GLAD they picked one with a 283 & NOT a 348 OR a 409. We don’t care about Value Or Show. Those 2 engines are GAS GUSSLERS & we are both fine with the Great 283 engine which I feel will get Many more miles out of than either Big Block!!! Just OHO! Car has 186,000 miles & still going strong!
This one gorgeous car. It looks too clean for 27k miles. Some documentation would be nice.
There is one nit to pick. Regardless of body color the wheels should be painted black.
Agree with A.G.; wheels should be black. That’s missed on a lot of big-buck restorations of ’61 Chevys. I love the ’61 but one small thing irks me….the radio pushbuttons that spell “CHEVY”. That’s so cheesy IMHO! It’s a ‘Chevrolet’; ‘Chevy’ would be used officially later only on Chevy II’s and Chevy Vans! I’d have had to buy a radio without pushbuttons that year. Sort-of like GMC pushbuttons saying “JIMMY”, or if an Oldsmobile or Mercury had only four buttons, using “OLDS” or “MERC”.
Bill…..they decided to go with Chevy on the buttons after numerous tests showed that not only did a nine button radio look ridiculous but the typical driver couldn’t reach beyond the “L” button. Lol
The wheels were not always black on these. As for the CHEVY on the radio pushbuttons, Buick did the exact same thing for 60.
Yes sir I’m almost 65. I remember my grandfather and father talking about push button radio and tinted window. That being desired options. And my father stating he’s going to steer clear of automatic transmission. Yes and a couple or three vehicles with that curb feeler added. A 56 Chevrolet with the signal light prism mounted on the dash.
All the advertising literature I can find shows the wheels to be the same color as the body, not black unless the car was black. People may have preferred black wheels and repainted them sometimes but it doesn’t appear they came from the factory that way.
Further research indicates that the SS models only, did come with black wheels regardless of body color and 1” wide white wall striped tires.
Not true, UNLESS black wheels were for SS model only. Wife’s ’61 came with white wheels. She is the Original Owner. I have photos to prove it.
My first car was a 61 Bubble Top. NOT QRIGINAL. It had a very radical 327 in it. It started life as 348 but that was long gone in 72. It had a 4 speed and a posi. Sat nose high cause the springs were never changed but it came outta the hole like it was shot in the ass. I was at the 1320 one afternoon and when I dropped the clutch, she came apart. Dragged it home and sold it for scrap.
I am glad you guys pointed out ,that the wheels should be painted black. For that reason I am out.
This is an amazing example of a very rare and desirable car. However, I question the “survivor” status. Chevrolet simply didn’t build them to this standard in 1961. It’s had far more than just a respray.
Plus in ’61, they still had the wider white walls!
Not on the Impala SS. They introduced the narrow white walls.
One re-spray and one nut and bolt restoration.
My red 61 Impala had red rims when new
The color is Seamist Turquoise, NOT Tropical Turquoise. This car is also a clone, not a REAL SS. No PS or PB (which were std on the SS) and it has the crossflags on the dash BEHIND the grab bar. On an SS, the crossflags were deleted due to the grab bar. It’s fairly easy to make a clone, but whomever did this one missed three key ingredients of the 61 SS.
See two belts on the pulley, rear one goes to generator, don’t know where forward belt goes
Bet there’s a LOT MORE Clones of ’61 SS’s than there are ORIGINAL ones out there!!!! Years ago I was at a car show in Portland & there was a guy there who owned 3 ’61 SS’s. He had 2 of them at the show & another at home! One of the guys running the show was VERY Knowledgeable about 61’s & he said Both of these were Definitely Clones! By the way, Thanks Larry D for the update on the Impala SS. My wife’s car came from the Mission Chevrolet Dealer in San Gabriel, Calif. & it came with wide whites & white rums. Car is White with Red stripe on side & Red interior! Not an SS. I believe there were just a little over 300 made that 1st year. Easy to clone for ’61 as the SS did Not have bucket seats or a console!
My SS has a two holes behind the grab bar but they were filled with lead
In regard to the grab bar, a true SS had a square hole, factory punched in the dash for the mounting bolt. A clone would have a drilled hole. Minus the possibility of a replaced dash from a true SS, that square hole is the mark of a true SS. In the late 60’s, I owned two 61 bubble tops. One was a dealer clone SS with a 283 4 bbl. The other was a true SS with the 348 AND a square hole in the dash.
LOL
This is one clean, mean machine! Beautifully done and a good write-up.
My original paint honduras maroon 61 Impala had honduras maroon wheels
Had a 1961 impala in 1969, 283, three on he tree, with the overdrive, that car could go. I could leave Chanute AFB in Illinois, at midnightt and pull into my parents driveway in NJ around 11 am next morning. Wish I never sold it, but a overseas transfer made it impractical to keep.
Beautiful restoration!
But just don’t roll over a bubble top, almost might as well be a convertible. Friend who had a convertible at the time had a roll over drill for the passengers, after market seat belts, duck down below window height (and steering column height, passenger to rear of driver’s back, driver to passenger’s lap. A,B,C and sometimes D pillars plus airbags have saved a lot of lives.
Nothing like sweet a classic like this, restored to show room condition.
Ron, this 1961 Chevrolet Impala is NOT ORIGINAL,
it is NOT a factory SS, it is NOT a Survivor.
Chevrolet did NOT…and….does NOT build cars to this perfection level.
.
Ron, we pay for and read BF looking for correct information and possibly an opportunity.
We can read the seller’s BS on our own.
I agree with T. Mann & it’s boring to read a re-hash of sellers claims, especially if they’re not true. Better for writers to critique/discuss the sellers claims.
Ron, the seller does not know the correct name of the color.
In1966 had a blue and white ’61 Bubble Top with the 283, 220 horse power pack, 3 on the tree, 4bbl and dual exhaust. Pretty fast too. Loved that car. Loved cruising South Jersey near Philly. Totally original, not molested in any way.
First of all Chevy only offered one roofline in 61 in 62 they offered two , I know I owned one brand new. And my wheels where painted white like the rest of the car.
This is a beautiful car with very desirable body style, motor, and gearbox options but there are surely some worrisome nits to pick.
The intake manifold is wrong, the air-filter housing is wrong. The tachometer fastened to the steering column is wrong, the electronic ignition module on the inner fender is wrong. The wheels are wrong, the spinners on the hubcaps are wrong. The emblems on the trunk and sides are wrong, the dashboard is shiny instead of being a satin finish, the grab handle is wrong …… It goes on and on.
I don’t know if factory data on the motor and transmission numbers are available for 1961models, but those would need careful scrutiny. Any buyer willing to pay the price asked is going to have a lot of questions.
It is a beautiful car. But it is NOT an original survivor, and any major auction company would pick it to pieces. There is no reason for the lack of full disclosure. The car will stand on its own merits. Allowing it to be portrayed as something it is not will, in the long run, hurt its overall value. The car deserves better.
Bogus car, not a real SS. Nice restoration , worth about 1/2 of the ask. Morley
First what alot of you people don’t understand is that different plants had different building codes back then. Also alot of times at the end of a building year they would put parts on a car from the previous year to get rid of them. The best way is to look at the vin and read the numbers that will tell you alot. about the car. If you are interested in buying the car you go look at it in person or have somebody do it for you. Alot of things could have changed on the car over the years remember it is 60 years old.
Frank O, I agree with what you wrote. Two points; back in the 80’s I was in the car show circuit. A fellow Corvette person (RIP) told me years earlier he was talking with someone who had worked at the St. Louis plant who told him if they ran out of a certain item they might run to a local hardware store and get whatever they needed. Secondly, a few years ago I ran into a guy with a 1967 Corvette convertible with 22,000 miles, a 327 and a BB hood. He told me GM had the hoods at the end of the year, knew they wouldn’t be needed for the ‘68’s so his car guu oht one, and his window sticker supported this.
This car is a clone, and not a very convincing one at that. PS & PB were std on SSs. This has neither. When the grabbar on the dash was part of the package, the crossflags on the dash behind the grabbar were deleted. This has both, which is not how SSs were built.
Thank you Chuck D.
“THIS CAR IS A CLONE, AND NOT A VERY CONVINCING ONE”
This is a wrongful deception intended to result in financial gain!
Edelbrock intake, MSD ignition, wrong emblems on the trunk and sides.
I have a survivor bubbletop in my garage, same color too, woo hoo!
I was going to buy it but you guys have totally made me not want it now by telling me it might not be a real SS. OK! I still want it but I don’t have the money.
There was not two rooflines on impalas in 61 unless you count the convertible bubble top was the only roof until 62
Russ, if this model car is your Dream, it is alright to buy the bubble-top, just have reserve cash to correct the shortcomings of that car.
Realize that an actual 1961 SS has a 6 figure value, and this car will never get there. It will always be a Clone, even if you spend another $100K on it.
One of my “drivers” is a clone 1970 SS 454 Chevelle.
Others can not tell until I park. I do not use it much.
I hope no one took my comment seriously that you guys had changed my mind about buying it because of your comments. I’d be proud to own it but had no intention of purchasing it. BTW, did anyone here see the old Scott Bakula TV show Quantum Leap where he crashed a 61 SS convertible into a concrete bridge piling? It was a maroon convertible. I saw it and told my wife I couldn’t believe what I just saw.
My Mom’s Impala had the same color rim as the car body from the factory, but all you saw was the little piece around the hub cap.
You have a cool Mom :-)
@ Ron Denny
I agree you haven’t seen many ’61 Impala Super Sports at car shows. They only made 453 so that answers that.
In the early 80s, when old cars got cool again and started bringing money, Terry Boyce wrote a great book, The Chevrolet Super Sports. If you want the real facts on the real 61 SS, read it. Long out of print. I have had my copy almost 40 years.
I guess what ‘Survivor’ means here is that: the car survived from 1961 till now 1) without being altered beyond recognition and 2) without going to the crusher. Glad it survived!
I love all the comments here about the car. First he is asking to much for it,second when buying a car for this much money you do your homework like checking the vin and all the documentation on the car. And you go look at it and drive it. So to say it is a clone without looking at everything about it, you are stating a opinion not fact.
frank Orzechowski: Car is a clone because ss models did not have cross flag emblem under grab bar (holes not drilled there on SS models), also no power brakes, no power steering & more indicators on posts (see above), a long list contraindications. I owned a real one back in the 70’s.
As I said above:
“This 1961 Chevrolet Impala is NOT ORIGINAL,
it is NOT a factory SS, it is NOT a Survivor.
Chevrolet did NOT…and….does NOT build cars to this perfection level.
.
Ron, we pay for and read BF looking for correct information and possibly an opportunity.
We can read the seller’s BS on our own.”
I guess you should talk to people that restore them to a higher level than factory.. First he knows what he has and should be able to back up his claims.
My 61 SS has a 1962 409 with 409 hp duel quad factory 4 speed would never part with it great looking 61 there