289/5-Speed: 1967 Ford Mustang Fastback

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

The owner of this 1967 Mustang Fastback is pretty candid about its condition and needs. He says that it has been sitting for years and that the buyer will need to budget for a total restoration. It seems to be a relatively solid classic, and the mechanical upgrades that he has performed should allow it to run a bit harder when it returns to active duty. If all of this intrigues you, the Mustang is located in Anaheim, California, and the owner has listed it for sale here on eBay. He has set a BIN of $32,000 for this project car, and the interest that it has generated has prompted 154 people to watch the listing.

There’s quite a bit to unpack with this Mustang, and while it has its bad points, there are some good ones to provide a welcome balance. It rolled off the line in September of 1966 wearing Dark Moss Green paint and was dispatched to a dealership in Fort Worth, Texas. It isn’t clear how long it spent in that location, but if it has split its life between there and its current location, that is some positive news for potential buyers to consider. Both areas feature climates that tend to preserve classic steel, and it may help explain why its rust problems appear to be pretty minor for a 1st Generation Mustang. Externally, the lower extremities look pretty clean, with one possible spot in the lower corner of the passenger door the only issue of note. When we delve below the surface, we come face-to-face with the worst of this car’s problems. The floors look crisp, and there are a few holes. However, the frame rails and torque box regions look clean, while the same appears true of the shock towers and cowl. Just when you thought that you’d gotten off pretty lightly, I have one further issue to consider. Somebody has treated the car to a repaint at some point, and the kindest thing that I can say about the quality is that I suspect that they might’ve applied it with a new brush. It’s pretty patchy and horrible, so I guess that the buyer will be faced with plenty of sanding and other preparation to provide the next coat of paint with a decent surface on which to adhere. While performing all of that sanding, they might want to investigate the rear quarter panels for problems. It looks like they both may hold their share of Bondo, and it would be interesting to know what this is hiding. Otherwise, the chrome and trim look restorable, and I can’t spot any flaws in the tinted glass.

The listing for this Mustang gets confusing when you look at the model and features listed under the heading. This indicates that this car is equipped with a 428ci V8. Then again, it also lists a K-Code, that it is both a ’68 and a ’69 model, and that it is also a convertible. I guess that there’s nothing quite like covering your bases! The Marti Report and VIN tell a different story. Both verify that the Fastback rolled off the line with a C-Code 289ci V8 under the hood, and I believe that this engine remains in residence today. It also shows the car as being equipped with a three-speed manual transmission, but that is something that the owner has changed. That 289 would’ve produced 200hp in its prime, which was sufficient to send the car through the ¼ mile in 16.2 seconds. However, with the owner’s upgrades to the intake, carburetor, ignition system, and air cleaner, it would be reasonable to assume that the power output had increased before the owner parked the car. As well as the engine upgrades, the three-speed transmission has made way for a five-speed unit, while the original rear end has been given the flick in favor of a 9″ Locker. When you piece it all together, it makes this a pretty bulletproof drivetrain. That doesn’t mean that the buyer will slip behind the wheel and drive off into the sunset. The owner admits that it hasn’t run for years and that someone will be faced with the task of reviving this beast. It’s probably going to be a fiddly process, but it will have its own reward the moment that sweet little V8 coughs into life once again.

This Mustang has produced a few surprises so far, and this trend continues when we turn our attention to its interior. I’m not going to pretend that its condition is show-quality, but it is far better than I expected. The upholstered surfaces generally look pretty good, with only some small marks on the driver’s seat likely to cause concern. I’d be willing to bet that the owner installed a new carpet set not long before he parked the vehicle because it remains free from wear and fading. On the downside, the trim is missing off the passenger side door, the rear trims have been cut to accommodate speakers, and you have to wonder what horrors the dash cover might be hiding. If the buyer is forced to replace these items, there’s a good chance that this interior would look impressive for less than $1,000.

This 1967 Mustang Fastback proves that we shouldn’t judge a book by its cover. It looks tired and neglected, but it seems that its appearance is deceptive. The lack of significant rust is an enormous bonus for potential buyers, while the updates to the drivetrain hold the promise of lively performance once the vehicle returns to our roads. The state of the interior is the icing on this cake, and this all combines to make it appear like a promising project. The BIN price could be a sticking point for some buyers because it isn’t cheap, and the next owner will know in their heart that no matter how faithful their restoration is, this can never be a full numbers-matching classic. My instincts tell me that the owner is over-reaching in this case, but with the way values are climbing, it is possible that one of those people watching might hit the button. Of course, you may choose to beat them to the punch. If you do, I’d love to receive ongoing progress reports on the project. I think that the end result could be a pretty special car.

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. jangus

    Good grief, some people seriously need to read up on what the total filter area required is for an engine. That “intake” is not an “upgrade”.

    Like 11
    • Eric B

      Why isn’t it? Not debating, just sincerely asking. I think “cold air intakes” are a joke IF they’re not enclosed in a box, therefore ironically sucking in hot air from the engine.

      But, on an older carberated engine, they all had wide open filters as well, sucking in hot air. I love the concept of the one on this car, but the ducting should extend further up to the grille. It would also be better if the filter were still on top of the carb and at the end of the duct.

      I have a 67 and had plans of modifying an original, enclosed housing assembly by adding duct work that runs up to the back of the grill.

      Do you just feel that the size of the filter is too small for the engine?

      Like 2
      • Eric B

        That should’ve read; if the filter were on top of the carb and NOT at the end of the duct….

        Like 2
      • Jangus

        A 302 running a max rpm of 6000 should have a filter area of roughly 87 square inches, using a good free flowing filter. I’ve never been a fan of the “cone inside of a cone” either. At the very least, I would’ve found a dual snorkel unit from a mid ’80’s carbed ‘Stang and fabbed up two ducts.

        Like 2
      • Eric B

        Gotcha and yeah, I was considering the older Fox body intake as well!! Then just paint it classic Ford blue. That unit was a great idea by Ford, not sure why they ended it there.That unit’s kind of the same concept as what I was saying about modifying an original unit by adding ducting.

        Like 0
    • Steve R

      Not sure why everyone is so worked up, it will take all of 30 seconds to remove and replace with something else.

      Steve R

      Like 2
  2. Troy s

    Was the 289 swapped for a ’85 302 HO along with the 5 speed ? Loooks like a single serpentine belt, who knows. Somethings been done here, the ratty exterior appearance, okay interior with a few newer items like the shifter and wheel, complete with a high output modded engine. Hmmm. Could be really nice.

    Like 7
  3. CadmanlsMember

    Yeah that is definitely a 5.0 from a later stang. Maybe an 85 still don’t know the condition of that engine and transmission. T5 stock isn’t the strongest. Some potential but open the wallet.

    Like 3
  4. Joe Machado

    Could become an Eleanor. Huuummmm

    Like 0
    • Steve R

      Those are more played out than Bullit clones.

      Steve R

      Like 16
  5. Martin

    Quite a bit of mud on the rear quarters. Must have taken a hard hit to the rear end.

    Like 0
  6. Frank

    Let me guess the owner, Its green and a Steve McQueen tribute car? Money car! Wrong year Bullit was a 68.

    Like 0
  7. CCFisher

    A few observations…

    * The grille is from a 68.
    * Seats are not original. They appear to be Ford seats from ’69 up, but I can’t pinpoint the source.
    * Interior door handles are from a ’68. Window cranks and door panels are correct for 1967.
    * The “crab stance,” with front wheels offset outward, is likely due to a Granada disc brake swap. Stock Mustang wheels won’t fit, and Granada wheels produce the “wide track” look seen here.

    It’s been altered enough that I wouldn’t buy at this price without an in-person inspection.

    Like 10
  8. T bone

    $32,000 for that hodge podge of miscellaneous parts. 😂😂😂😂

    Like 1
  9. Valentine

    A T5 is definitely not an upgrade. They’re made from saltines held together with Kleenex, spit, and prayer. There are worse 5-speeds, but no factory was silly enough to install ’em behind V8s.

    Like 0
  10. James427

    Seller lowered BIN to 29k and still no bids. It is about a 12k car.

    Like 1
    • 240zzzz

      It sold for $28,500…..

      Like 0
  11. Haynes

    Ouch

    Like 1
  12. joenywf64

    I’d rather see a fuctional shaker hood scoop on this car.
    & a mustang II sport steering wheel.
    Good grocery getter & night cruiser.

    Like 0
  13. CarNut

    sold for 28,500!
    I’m sure it’s on a boat by now lol
    67 FB Projects are getting harder to find…

    Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Get new comment updates via email. Or subscribe without commenting.

Barn Finds