57k Original Miles: 1973 Plymouth Duster 340

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

If I could give an owner two pieces of advice when selling their classic, they would be to provide as many high-quality images as possible and supply clear and concise information that leaves nothing open to potential incorrect interpretation. This 1973 Plymouth Duster 340 falls short on both counts, but not to the point where we should ignore it. The car presents well, has a claimed 57,000 original miles on its odometer, and is a turnkey proposition that a new owner can enjoy immediately. I must say a big thank you to Barn Finder Rocco B. for spotting the Duster listed here on Craigslist in Virginia Beach, Virginia. You could drive away in the classic by handing the seller $21,500.

This Duster raises nearly as many questions as it answers, with the seller describing it as “a true barn find.” They don’t elaborate on the statement, meaning that not only do we not know when and where it was uncovered, but how long it may have spent hibernating. They confirm that the Duster received a repaint in Rallye Red, which apparently occurred many years ago. It still presents well, with no major issues or shortcomings. The decals look crisp and clean, and there are no visible problems with the trim or glass. The biggest question that often hangs over classics of this vintage surrounds the possible presence of rust. The seller doesn’t mention any problems, and none are visible in the supplied photos. However, I always encourage an in-person inspection before committing cash to a classic purchase to provide peace of mind. The seller appears approachable and may be willing to accommodate those who are genuinely interested in pursuing this Plymouth further.

I mentioned the need for a comprehensive image gallery in a listing, and that is where this Duster falls slightly flat. There are no engine bay shots, meaning we can’t examine under the hood to identify potential problems. However, we know that this Duster features a 340ci V8, a three-speed TorqueFlite transmission, and front disc brakes. The V8, which the seller describes as numbers-matching, would have pumped out 240hp and 295 ft/lbs of torque when new, allowing the car to cover the ¼-mile in a very respectable 15.2 seconds. However, with this engine now sporting headers and dual exhaust, the improved breathing might knock a tenth off that figure. Frustratingly, there is no mention of verifying evidence for the claimed odometer reading of 57,500 original miles. The seller confirms that the Duster runs and drives, making it a turnkey proposition.

This Duster’s interior is missing its radio, but it appears to be otherwise complete. It is tidy and serviceable, and many would consider its condition acceptable for a driver-grade classic. I will qualify that by stating that there is only one interior image, meaning the condition of the back seat, rear trim, and headliner fall into the unknown category. The dash and pad look okay, and apart from minor damage, the same appears true of the console. Once again, an in-person inspection will reveal the truth about this interior.

It is sometimes said that hope springs eternal, and I question whether that might be the case with this 1973 Plymouth Duster 340. The seller’s price appears to be above the current market average and aligns with the value suggested by Hagerty for a #3 example. Someone also once said that if you don’t ask you don’t get, and that might be equally relevant. These cars offered buyers in 1973 affordable performance in an era when horsepower was dribbling out the exhausts of many more fancied vehicles. This is reflected in the current market, where Duster 340 values have continued climbing steadily while many cars that were the natural opposition in 1973 are experiencing the reverse. Therefore, I won’t be surprised if someone takes the bull by the horns and gives this Duster a new home. Are you tempted to be that person?

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. Stan 🏁Member

    Love the plain rims, no spoiler look.

    Like 6
  2. Nevadahalfrack NevadahalfrackMember

    As Adam pointed out what little we see of it looks decent but another note to the seller-for cryin’ out loud at least wipe down the interior even if you’re too lazy to really clean it! Maybe that’s the reason for a lack of interior photos..

    Like 6
  3. Troy

    I like it but I’m thinking those are ’71 or ’72 bumpers as the ’73s all had the large rubber bumper guards for the 5mph safety regs. I know my ’73 Satellite had those.

    Like 3
    • Terrry

      Good eye, I don’t know about bumper guards but the front bumper on this car should at least “stick out” more. I’m thinking it’s been replaced with an older setup.

      Like 0
      • DON

        Its a 73 bumper minus the bumper guards. the 74-76 stuck out more due to the 5 mph bumper shocks. the 73s had a big beam , but no shocks

        Like 1
  4. Rickirick

    Not to beat a dead horse but as Adam & Nevada aptly point out, you are tryin to sell a product regardless of asking price. If you’re not goin to take the time to clean up, then pay a detailer to have done. This has always been my pet peeve when selling a classic. Presentation & honesty are everything. And don’t leave out pride. ✌

    Like 3
  5. Patrick

    The 73 is not my favorite 71 is. The 73 was not the best year for the grill, hood or tail lights. The cast crank 340 was a downer with the small J Head 1.88 intk valves the more eoco friendly intake ports, 8.5 comp pistons and milder cam. Thermo-quad carb. But at 49 years old and with the classics disappearing fast. This one would make a nice cruiser.

    Like 2
    • Matthew Dyer

      I’m with you Patrick. My ’71 was a Twister with the 318 automatic.
      First car and I abused it the best I could with the 2bbl. Naturally, a 340 found its way under the hood.

      Like 0
  6. DON

    All Duster 340s came standard with dual exhaust , so that’s not much of a selling point . Bumper guards have been removed , trim rings missing , both are no big deal to replace , the tail panel stripe is also absent and the bucket seats have been redone in a non OEM style pattern. Hard to think a car with such low miles could have had ripped seats and needed a paint job , but I suppose it could happen. Some under the hood and under car shots would be a big plus , and maybe the vin# to tell if its a clone or the real deal ! The seller seems to know little about this car or is purposely being vauge .

    Like 3
    • stillrunners stillrunnersMember

      Agree…..and it’s so fast the low miles knocked the radio out…..love the last quote – ” one you hear about after it’s gone” in this case I’d be glad it did….the seller is such a jokester !

      Like 0
  7. Shuttle Guy Shuttle GuyMember

    Those huge wheel wells are screaming for some N50 15’s ( 295/50R15 in todays terms|) and a mild “Rake Job.” “Old School Baby!”

    Like 2
    • 370zpp 370zpp

      Thumbs up.

      Like 1
    • JoeNYWF64

      Unfortunately, sooner or later, i bet this duster will be fitted with huge low profile blackwalls & bigger wheels – sooner if those tires are old or the new owner is young enough.

      Like 1
      • Shuttle Guy Shuttle GuyMember

        Man I hate that look!

        Like 0
  8. Bigbird

    No response from this Craigslist listing. More than likely a scam that everyone is wasting their breath with.

    Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Barn Finds