Some classics appear on the market with so many positive attributes it is impossible to determine their greatest strength. That is the case with this 1973 Chevrolet Corvette. The seller is only the car’s second owner. It has recently emerged and been revived after years in storage, it presents superbly, and it has a genuine 76.000 miles on its odometer. Take your pick because there’s enough there to satisfy most enthusiasts. If you want to become its third owner, you will find the Corvette here on Craigslist in Central California. The seller will hand you the keys when you hand them $22,000. I must say a big thank you to eagle-eyed Barn Finder Pat L. for spotting this stunning survivor.
The seller is this Corvette’s second owner. They located it hidden away in dry storage, a spot it occupied for a considerable period. Dragging it out into the light of day revealed a classic with plenty of positive attributes. It is an unmolested vehicle wearing its original Mille Miglia Red paint. It shines beautifully, and if there are any defects, they aren’t visible in the supplied photos. The same is true of the fiberglass because I can’t spot any cracks or other issues. The seller doesn’t provide information on the condition of the frame or birdcage. Still, if the ‘Vette spent its life in its current location, the dry climate should mean there would be nothing more than possible surface corrosion in those areas. This year marked the first for the C3 Corvette with the new front bumper with the urethane cover. The upgrade, performed to comply with safety regulations, brought its own headache for owners. Chevrolet had significant experience painting fiberglass, but urethane posed unique challenges. Paint color may have appeared consistent between the two materials initially, but it faded at different rates that could become apparent as time passed. This car has avoided that problem, and its trim and glass are spotless. The Corvette features its original Rally wheels shod with new tires.
Chevrolet offered buyers a choice of three motors to power their ’73 Corvette, with this car’s original owner selecting the L82 version of the 350ci V8. This motor produces 250hp, which feeds to the back wheels via a four-speed manual transmission. That combination would allow the Corvette to cover the ¼ mile in 15.1 seconds. The choice of the L82 is fascinating, especially when you consider the LS4 version of the 454 dropped the ET to 14.7 seconds and would have cost $49 less than the L82. However, there are a couple of points to ponder. The first is that the LS4 added considerable weight to the car, which is the sworn enemy of high-performance vehicles. The second revolves around the subject of top speed. The LS4 may send a Corvette down the ¼-mile faster than an L82, but the balance shifts when we focus on top speed. The 454 runs out of breath with the needle nudging 116mph, but if the driver keeps the pedal to the metal, the L82 will see 127mph. Potential buyers will find plenty of positive news when assessing this Corvette’s mechanical health. After years of hibernation, the seller worked carefully through the revival process, ensuring no stone was left unturned. They pulled the numbers-matching small-block and treated it to a rebuild. They replaced the entire braking system, and it looks like they upgraded the ignition system. We receive no information on how this classic runs or drives, but the list of work and spotless presentation provide cause to be cautiously optimistic. The seller claims the car has a genuine 76,000 miles on the clock, and while they fail to mention supporting evidence, the ownership history suggests it may exist. It looks like the new owner could build a relationship with this Corvette by driving it home once they’ve handed over the cash.
While the original owner may have primarily focused on performance when ordering this Corvette, it appears they didn’t mind a few creature comforts. It is no surprise that this car features leather upholstery, air conditioning, power windows, and an AM/FM radio. If considered an original and unmolested survivor, this interior is very acceptable. The leather seat upholstery has a few wrinkles, which is common with this material. The carpet may have faded patches, but with inconsistencies evident in the supplied photos, these could also be illusions. There is no crumbling plastic or evidence of UV damage. Overall, I would classify the interior condition as right at the top of what you might expect to find in a survivor-grade vehicle.
Part of my role as a Barn Finds writer is to provide entertainment and information for our readers, but it also allows me the opportunity to spark healthy conversation and debate. With that thought in mind, I would like to say that if I’d had the funds at my disposal and had walked into a Chevrolet dealership in 1973, intent on driving away in a new Corvette, it would probably have been this car. I know we will have readers advocating for a 454-equipped version, and I understand and respect that thinking. The reality is that this car would have cost marginally more, but I feel it represented money well-spent. I won’t argue that the additional power and torque of the big-block would have provided better acceleration and a faster ¼-mile ET, but that performance comes at a cost. A Corvette with a 454 under the hood tips the scales 212lbs heavier than this car. The additional mass is almost entirely over the front axle, compromising weight distribution and balance. The big-block ‘Vette may be faster in a straight line, but it would lose that advantage under brakes and through the bends. That makes our feature car the more complete package to my eye and helps explain why I wouldn’t mind finding it in my garage. It will be fascinating to read the feedback to see whether or not people agree with my logic. So, over to you.
Beautiful! Won’t last long at that price.
Car does look clean, but where are the rear square exhaust tips. Ut has the side pipe rear panel under the bumpers but no side pipes…
That’s a concern along with no alarm key, no reverse lights in the inner lenses, no L82 emblems on the hood, good chance it was hit in the rear and repainted as it looks way too good for 49 years.
No side pipes in 1973.
I’m thinking they used a rear panel from a ’69 the only year side pipes were an option. Explains no alarm key and the smooth lower panel.
“The additional mass is almost entirely over the front axle, compromising weight distribution and balance. The big-block ‘Vette may be faster in a straight line, but it would lose that advantage under brakes and through the bends.”
The writer is often wrong but never in doubt when it comes to C3 engine placement, be it big block or small block. The “additional mass” is 20 inches behind the front axle.
Nice write up Adam. I own a 73 4 speed coupe with an L48. Could not find a decent L82 car when I was looking to buy. The 73 gets criticized for reasons I cannot comprehend. First, it is better looking than the 70 to 72 cars. It was the first Corvette with radial tires, has better ride due to improved body mounts, safer with steel beams in the doors and a much better looking and functional hood. The hood eliminated the very troublesome vacuum wiper door system, which was total junk. I owned a 1971 454 coupe in 1976. It had numerous problems that were just ridiculous for a 5 year old car. Today, I have owned my 73 coupe for more than seven years and love driving it as much as possible. It is far superior to that POS 71 in every respect. The asking price for this car is below market in my opinion. This car has some options, the smog pump is still intact and nice colors. The only thing I dislike is the useless and ugly luggage rack.
I like the luggage rack. Had one on my 77. Looked bitchin with the t-tops attached.
All this one needs is a nice set of fender skirts and a continental kit. (Kidding)
Useless Luggage Rack?
On my ’70 Convertible, they came in handy when doing real things with the top down, like camping. Maybe not the way you use your car.
You should have been more romantic. Our 1976 proudly sported its luggage rack. Our Fall ritual was to strap an old wicker picnic basket to the rack and take a day off from work (To avoid the old-fart leaf peepers) and head for Keuka or Seneca Lake for a nice drive to enjoy the colors in the Finger Lakes region. After a nice picnic lunch, we would take a slow drive back to Rochester and prepare to put the Corvette to bed for the season that weekend. And now we are “Old-Fart leaf peepers!
Frank, we used to do the NH equivalent – put the top down, throw on sweatshirts, strap the luggage on the rack, and cruise the White Mountains to enjoy the fall foliage. Back then (late 80s, early 90s), you could actually park an older Corvette without worry, so we would stay overnight in a roadside motel.
Great memories.
Now, a C3 just doesn’t look right without the luggage rack.
I would’ve chosen the big block,since I’d rather have tire frying torque, I care not about handling, and zero to 100mph is all I care about, not top speed.On a totally unrelated note, a pet peeve of mine is using the term “unmolested” to describe an automobile. Sooo, it wasnt inappropriately touched by a creepy uncle?!?
Why only the chrome bumper on the rear? The 71,s had both. If this is a non-air condition car. It will burn your feet up in hot weather. Nice looking car,but I,d still want to check it out .
Well, it’s a ’73 hence the front bumper cover, the smooth side fender vents and it does have A/C.
Some folks take photos of their car with various trophies in front of it. The owner must be proud that this one has won so many paint cans.
thought they were trophies till i looked closer? lol
This looks in nice shape and it’s always interesting to see what BF readers find when looking these nice cars over. Makes you question the seller.
Plus, not sure why the seller would have ticked the convertible box in the ad.
Ron, good catch on reverse lights and alarm key. I agree that its possibly been hit in the rear. Unfortunately it’s common for Corvettes to have many unreported or hidden issues, really hard to find honest cars
I had a Mille Miglia Red ’73 so it was an easy spot. No reason for the alarm not being there.
Lucky You, 73 is one of my favorite years. A friend got a beautiful gold 73 with saddle interior auto with A/C when he got out of army in 77. Suprised how much more quiet and refined the 73 seemed compared to 68 to 72. It had the finned wheel covers which I thought looked good on it. I had forgotten about the alarm keyhole being on the back that year.