The 1967 model year marked one of significant transformation for the First Generation Mustang when it came to the question of performance offerings. While buyers in previous years had been restricted to various versions of the sweet little 289ci V8, buyers in 1967 could shoehorn a 390ci V8 into the car’s engine bay. That’s what occupies the engine bay of this ’67 Mustang GTA, with the seller describing it as a beautiful driver. That assessment seems fair, although lifting it to a higher level would not be difficult or expensive. It needs a new home, so they have listed it for sale here on Craigslist in Farmington, New Mexico. At $84,900, it is hardly cheap, so let’s take a look to see if the price is justified. I must thank Barn Finder Pat L for spotting this gem for us.
I don’t have the figures in front of me to prove it, but Springtime Yellow seems to be one of the lesser-seen shades Ford offered buyers during 1967. Most examples from that year that appear at Barn Finds seem to wear colors like Wimbledon White or various shades of Blue. That makes this car refreshingly different, and the seller confirms it is the car’s original color. They treated it to a refresh, and it presents impressively. The exterior shows few flaws or issues, with no dings or bruises. The hood alignment is slightly off near the leading edge of the front fenders, but this may require nothing but some tweaking and adjustment. There is no evidence of rust in the supplied photos and no mention of hidden issues in the listing. The glass is spotless, as is the chrome. The styled wheels and narrow whitewall tires add a classy finishing touch to the exterior of a car that is sure to turn heads wherever it goes.
If I were to define my perfect Mustang, it would be a 1966 GT Fastback with a K-Code 289 under the hood. Of course, if I had the money, I would find this ’67 GTA hard to resist. That model year marked the first where V8 buyers could opt for a V8 beyond the 289, and the “king of the kids” was undoubtedly the S-Code 390ci monster. While the K-Code delivered 271hp, the 390 put 320hp under the driver’s right foot. This car also features a three-speed automatic transmission, power steering, and power brakes. How much of an impact did the larger engine have? A K-Code GTA could cover the ¼ mile in 15 seconds, but the 390 dropped that figure to 14.5 seconds. That wasn’t too shabby! The seller doesn’t confirm that the Mustang is numbers-matching, although they hold a Marti Report confirming its original specifications. They describe it as a beautiful driver but raise the possibility of the new owner updating the drivetrain, suspension, or brakes to make it more civilized. I probably wouldn’t touch a thing because that may destroy the essence of what this car is all about.
If there is a shortcoming with this Mustang, that dubious distinction falls to the upholstery on the driver’s seat. It isn’t torn or shredded, but it is stretched and worn. The problem isn’t severe, and it is acceptable if the buyer considers it a survivor-grade vehicle. However, a new set of covers would be relatively cheap and help achieve a higher presentation level. Otherwise, this interior needs nothing. The remaining upholstered surfaces are excellent, as are the carpet, dash, and pad. There are no aftermarket additions, with the factory AM radio occupying its rightful spot in the dash. It isn’t weighed down with luxury features, but the roof console and Sport Deck rear seat are welcome inclusions.
Undoubtedly, this 1967 Mustang GTA presents beautifully, and achieving a level close to perfection should not be difficult. First Generation Mustangs continue their strong performance in the classic market, particularly those cars that rolled off the line with the larger V8s under the hood. This GTA is far from cheap, and the buyer market for vehicles in this price bracket can be limited. That begs the question of its price and whether it is justified. Recent sales results suggest that it is at the top end of what potential buyers might expect to pay, which will further limit the seller’s potential buyer base. It has only been on the market for a short time, and I wouldn’t expect a quick sale. However, while potential new owners are unlikely to be tripping over each other at the seller’s door, I won’t be surprised if the car finds a new home sooner rather than later.
This is a gorgeous fastback. No doubt. I perhaps mistakenly thought that the GT option package included a tach, which this car seems to lack. Secondly, it appears to have the deluxe interior as evidenced by the “aluminum” appearance trim and the overhead console, and yet lacks the center console. Maybe Mr. Marti (report) can verify or disclaim my recolection as a former 67/68 GT owner.
Love stangs and wish him luck on sale as it attempts to set a new price point.
I could learn to love the color on this one 👍
…or you could buy a brand new 2022 Shelby GT500
Very nice car for less than you pay for a brand new top shelf 4+4 pickup truck or a new Jeep Grand Wagoneer. Wish I could afford it
If I were a millionaire, I’d buy this NOW. However, I spent my life in the military, and then teaching, so clearly I have an aversion to money. That’s my shortsightedness, and someone else’s good luck! I hope whoever buys this gorgeous example enjoys it as much as I would have!
Interesting car. Looks to be very nice. It does seem to have a mix of Deluxe Decor and standard interior features. The lower door trim chrome pieces with lights and reflectors are missing along with a console. I have a 67 Coupe with the deluxe decor interior and both consoles and the door trim. I think the price is very optimistic. Still a very nice car. Shame it doesn’t have factory AC.
85 large for this car is a big ask. I admire and respect Mustangs for what they were in their time, but have you driven a fastback Mustang lately? My brother had a ’67 fastback and I drove it just enough to hate it. I’m 6′-1″ and I looked forward directly into the sun visor/roof and had to crane my neck down just to see the road. Traffic lights? Watch the car next to you for a clue when to go. Rear visibility is a joke with those sail panels and mail slot rear window. The single side mirror gives a good look at the fender hump behind the door and nothing else. And seating comfort was not high on the designer’s list of must-do items.
That said, the 1967 Mustang is among the prettier cars ever built and I love looking at them, too bad they suck so bad to actually use.
I agree with most of Martini ST’s comments. The coupe version is much better for rear visibility. 2 outside mirrors also makes a difference. My biggest complaint is the vague power steering and weak braking even with power brakes. I am restomodding my coupe with rack and pinion power steering and 4 wheel disc brakes, bigger front sway bar and adding a rear sway bar. Seat comfort is typical for a car of this vintage. Love the look of the fastback, but I prefer the coupe. I might add that the rear visibility of the fastbacks only got worse in the following years.
Hmm. SF Bay area? Did the car or seller come from there?
Nice car but way overpriced. It’s not a 1968, which is much more valuable and desireable than the 1967. But hey, you never know……