No Reserve Turbo: 1965 Chevrolet Corvair Corsa Convertible

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

If you’ve ever owned a Corvair, you’ve probably been asked if it was a “Spyder.” While the Spyder was introduced as a turbocharged upgrade to the Corvair Monza in 1962, Chevrolet changed the name to “Corsa” when they introduced the new second-generation Corvair for the 1965 model year. With a standard 140-horsepower six with four carburetors (and an optional 180-horsepower turbocharged six), the Corsa was the hot Corvair setup for the two model years it lasted (1965 and 1966). Therefore, among Corvair collectors, not much could be better than a turbocharged Corsa Convertible, such as the example that Barn Finder PRA4SNW found here on Hagerty Marketplace in Marine City, Michigan. The high bid is $4,700 and climbing.

While all non-turbocharged Corvairs had at least two carburetors (one for each cylinder head), the turbo Corsa has one Carter side-draft carburetor. The turbo engine has a few internal upgrades to deal with the extra heat that the boost brought to the party, and so equipped, the Corsa was a pretty hot performer for a car with a 164-cubic-inch engine. Motor Trend found that the Corsa could reach 60 miles per hour in 10.9 seconds, finish the quarter-mile in 18.1 seconds at 79 miles per hour, and finally achieve a top speed of 114.

While the two-tone seats are a custom touch (the trim code indicates a blue interior), almost everything else appears to be as-delivered from the Willow Run plant near Ypsilanti, Michigan. Another deviation from stock is the steering wheel, a wood-rimmed unit that looks similar to the wheel used on Corvairs with telescoping steering columns (this car does not appear to have that feature). It does have a four-on-the-floor (all Corsas had manual transmissions, but a three-speed was standard equipment).

The Corsa represented here doesn’t come without flaws; the seller mentions that the car has a few paint issues, including “dings, bumps, and overspray,” along with some other assorted bruises. The clock and fuel gauge don’t work either (does the clock ever work?). Luckily, Corvair parts are plentiful and reasonably priced (for the most part). Although there are a couple pictures of the undercarriage, they’re taken at such a low angle that it’s impossible to learn much from them; however, the trunk appears to be in reasonably good shape (they are often rotten).

I would harbor a guess that the car has had some rust repair, as it is missing the exhaust cutout that was located on the passenger side of the rear valance on turbo Corsas. The lower quarter panels are, after all, another common rust point on second-generation Corvairs.

You might be thinking that perhaps this car wasn’t originally equipped with a turbocharged engine, but the Fisher Body tag tells us that it was. In the bottom line, you can see the fourth group of codes: “4FO.” The “O” means that the car was equipped with the 180-horsepower engine, which was important to Fisher Body because the line would have to know that the car received the aforementioned exhaust cutout in the valance panel.

Finding a Corvair that hasn’t had a bit of rust repair after 61 years is a tall task, so a little nip here and a tuck there wouldn’t turn me off to the car if I really wanted it. It looks like a nice driver that has had some recent work after ten years of dormancy, including new wheel cylinders and fluid changes in the engine and transaxle.

Corvairs are inexpensive fun cars with styling that was lauded when new and still looks great today, so why not try one of the most collectible of the whole bunch?

Get email alerts of similar finds

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. bobhess bobhessMember

    Did try a nonturbo Monza and loved it. Always loved the look of the ’65 and up cars. Nice car here.

    Like 15
    • Aaron TothAuthor

      I agree, Bob. I own a ’65 Monza Convertible with the basic 95-horse 164 and a four-speed. Although I should have bought a much better one to start with (I’ve had mine almost 20 years), dropping the top and rowing through the gears always brightens my day.

      Like 16
      • Kevin McArdle

        Dropping the top and going for a cruise does more good for my well being than a year of seeing a shrink.

        Like 11
    • Arfeeto

      Ditto here for a ’65 Corsa coupe, non-turbo. Would that I still owned that car. It was was quick, well handled, and (I think) beautifully styled.

      Like 6
  2. Howard A Howard AMember

    Does it have a turbo? Of “Corsa” it does ( boom-tis) Never saw’r one in real life, and by golly, a 10 year old kid would have noticed that. For good reason, Corvair was on a bit of a quandary with, you know who, but undaunted, Americans bought over 1.8 MILLION Corvairs, almost 250,000 in ’65 alone, 2nd to 1962, with 300,000 sold. Of those, only a scant 9,000 had the 180hp and why none were seen. I read, this car was the top of the line in ’65, costing close to $3300 bucks, and why it was saved the fate of most. It was almost a grand more than a basic Corvair, that most bought. It’s unusual to see a back of a Corvair not black and dripping of oil. Shortcomings by some aside, I feel, as an US car enthusiast, the Corvair was a great car.

    Like 14
  3. A.G.

    This poor Corvair has had a rough life. Besides the usual dings there’s signs of accident damage in both the right front and left rear. A couple crappy paint jobs have been done as well. At first I was impressed with how clean the ‘frunk’ is. Closer inspection shows the brake line at the master cylinder is covered with speckled paint. At some point there was an attempt to deceive.

    It’s too bad as this was a nicely optioned Corsa. Among the features were a power top, remote driver’s mirror, and front seat belts with retractors.

    Like 7
    • Bakes

      Right rear as well. Lots of shop class level body filler on this one, and poor paint prep work and application. Good base, depending on what was left after media blasting the poor thing for a restoration. Cute as hell cars.

      Like 1
    • PRA4SNW PRA4SNWMember

      That’s why I like submitting cars to BF. At first blush, this looked to me like a really nice car that right now is a great deal. If I were interested in it, these comments are like bringing an expert in.

      Like 0
      • Aaron TothAuthor

        Another thing that you’d really want to check out: the rocker panels. Second-gen Corvairs used “flush-and-dry” rocker panels that collected leaves and dirt, which acted like a sponge. Unfortunately, the rockers ARE the frame on a convertible Corvair. They use 12-gauge steel in addition to a very heavy inner “rib” that you will not find on coupes. If the rockers are rusted, they’re a lot of work to repair, even if you’re just working on a driver.

        Like 0
  4. SG

    The four-carb, 140 horsepower Corsa would be better than the turbo. With the turbo, until it kicks in at around 3,000 4,000 RPM, you’re driving around with 95 horsepower the whole time.

    Like 6
    • Henry DavisMember

      140 almost required a uni-syn gauge to keep ’em running right. I’ve still got mine from 1966.

      Like 3
    • on_and_on on_and_onMember

      You know your Corvairs SG.

      Like 1
  5. DCasey

    I had a 65 Corsa and loved it!

    Like 4
  6. Robert Hickman

    Most of us with any Corvair history appreciate the unique Corsa 180 hp Turbo engine. I purchased the last 150 hp Turbo Spyder Convertible off the Dealers showroom floor in 1964. It was the last Spyder Convertible the dealer had in stock and the 1965 models were on the ground. I have had some type of Corvair ever since. My daily driver is a Rampside. Too bad the owner wasted money on the incorrect interior while ignoring other needs. Still, a 189 hp Turbo Corsa Convertible and well worth saving…

    Like 2
  7. Russell Smith

    I had a 1965 Turbo Corsa convertible when I was in high school. I was the 2nd owner and paid $1200 for it. It ran well but I wanted more power………so I sold it and bought a 1961 Corvette.

    Like 3
  8. Billyboy

    Nice looking from 50 feet. Body work and paint probably exceed price paid.

    Like 0
  9. The Other Chris

    Looks nice until looking at the close up pics… that is the most craptacular paint job I’ve ever seen. Looks like it was literally painted with dollar store spray cans without even washing it first.

    Like 2
  10. jvanrell1973@gmail.com Jason V.Member

    Yes, it has a lot of body filler. Yes, it has dings and signs of cheap body work and paint all over. That said, the seller is providing 102 photos, with many close-ups of the imperfections. No lies here.

    It’s a 1965 Corsa turbo. There aren’t many. For the right price, this will make a fun driver that you restore a little at a time.

    Like 2
  11. 19sixty5Member

    I have owned a bunch of Corvair’s on and off since the mid 70’s and still have two, one a V8 conversion the other a California built 66 Monza convert, 140/4 with factory AC. I may be on the hunt for another 65/66 turbo car in the near future. This one, for the right price could be a fun driver to fix as you drive. Get a can or two of interior dye for the seats, which in my opinion would improve the looks substantially.

    Like 0
  12. PRA4SNW PRA4SNWMember

    SOLD for $8,560.
    17 bids.

    Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Barn Finds