Oodles Of Fun! 1960 Chevrolet Bel Air

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

Pity the poor 1960 full-size Chevrolet. It doesn’t possess the “love it or hate it” crazy, full-on batwing styling of the ’59, nor does it have the svelte, modern lines of the ’61. It’s an in-betweeny! Regardless, over 1.4 M copies rolled off of Chevrolet assembly lines in model year ’60 so it was a popular in-betweeny. Today’s find, located in North Las Vegas, Nevada, is a Bel Air two-door sedan that’s had some interesting mods so let’s look it over. This Chevy is available, here on eBay for a current bid of $9,300 with 34 bids tendered so far.

Interestingly, even though the Bel Air got bounced to the back seat in ’58, thanks to the new Impala, the Bel Air still had some panache in ’60 as it maintained both its two-door and four-door hardtop versions, body styles that would be later reserved for only the top drawer Impala, and then followed by the luxury level Caprice. That said, it’s not the case here as our subject car is the more commonly found two-door sedan.

The listing for this car is pretty extensive as it has experienced lots of upgrades and improvements. The seller suggests that the most important option may be that it’s “oodles of fun!” The grille badging would lead one to believe that there is a 348 CI “W head” V8 under the hood but that’s not the case as there is a newer 350 CI small-block now ensconced in the engine room. The seller adds, “no smoke, no leaks, with a fully rebuilt reliable Rochester four-barrel carb“. Gear changes are handled by a 4L60E, overdrive automatic transmission – a great upgrade! Other improvements include a move to front disc brakes including all of the necessary hydraulics. An additional statement suggests, “every single system on this car has been gone through, EVERYTHING functions as new,..” There’s that “gone through” claim again. Added is, “this car does not feel like an elephant on roller skates when going around a curve” along with “runs and drives excellent“.

The exterior, adorned with Cragar S/S wheels, shows pretty well. The finish is fair on the vertical surfaces – not so much so on the horizontal. The seller calls it” a nice old patina” but it looks more like a really worn-out paint job. That said, the body shows as basically sound. The seller does state, “this is not a rust-free car, I replaced the rear floor pans, which is typical rust out with these particular cars. The old ones were cut out and new ones welded in and sealed, the rest are fine, the trunk sheet metal had been reinforced with fiberglass mat before I got the car so I left it alone as it’s pretty solid and I didn’t see the need to mess with it“. There is some photographic evidence of rust in the quarters behind the wheel openings but the exterior is very complete with all of its extensive ’60 vintage stainless trim still attached.

We are told that the interior has been completely replaced with “period correct looking fabric“. I searched for ’60 Bel Air interior images and what I found doesn’t look like what’s here but OK, it does look like a late ’50s/early ’60s pattern, color, and style. It shows well and would seem to have been professionally prepared – even the headliner matches in contrast. As is popular today, the instrument panel gives off a non-stock green glow. Everything supposedly works except for the clock – typical.

The listing concludes with a mention of a starring TV role for this car in, “Car crews with Supercar Blondie” – Las Vegas edition. Never heard of it… It’s obscure enough a reference that I don’t think I’d tout this car as having star power but it’s still a notable factoid. The seller has put a lot of time, effort, and probably $$$ into this Bel Air sedan, whether he’ll get it all back or not is another matter.  But when you think about it, it probably doesn’t matter. Cars like this serve as a hobby and if the seller enjoyed his time with it, that’s all that matters, right?

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. Bluetec320 Bluetec320

    Before I read the article, I thought Stevie Nicks was standing on the trunk lid, lol

    Like 14
  2. Mike K

    I always wanted a 60, a older fren I had growing up had a red 60 Impala hardtop, 348 and, I think a 3 speed. It was a dream in my early teens. Like most teenage dreams I never did own one. Had the Road Runner’s, Chevelle’s, a Camaro and now a 06 Mustang GT convertible. Wish I would have kept that dream, they’re still sexy in my eyes !

    Like 6
  3. gaspumpchas

    Love a 60! I’d add a 4 or 5 speed tranny. Reminds me of my high school years. A friend and myself pulled a rust free 2dsd out of a junk yard; installed a 283 3 speed. We had a guy who would sell us those little 3 speeds for $5. First time I hung pedals and it turned out great Had Cragars!!! Good luck and happy motoring.
    Cheers
    GPC

    Like 9
  4. FrankD

    I was expecting a 348 or 409 engine attached to a 4 speed. Someone make it happen!

    Like 2
  5. local_sheriff

    IMHO the ’60 Chev isn’t simply an ‘in-betweeny’ as suggested in the write-up. It has numerous features on its own and just the delta-wing planes depending on trim level and number of doors is worth an article in itself. Personally I find it to be a sleeker more refined design than the ’59.

    Also, the ’60 is the last year when GM still made an effort to design their lower-tier 2door post cars with a greenhouse reminiscent of their coupe idols. While the ’61up 2door post roof designs are fascinating it’s also very obvious that those roof profiles were intended to give 2door post B-bodies a ‘lesser’ impression in order to promote sales of HT cars

    Like 5
  6. Gary Thompson

    Liked these cars –Drag raced a ’60 Impala in Great Bend during the early 60’s… 348 with factory tri-power and powerglide, but we added a 4:11 rear end..Kicked butt in D–Stock Automatic..15 sec -..89 mph..Those were the days..

    Like 6
  7. Gary

    I don’t like 60-61 Chevys but this one does something for me with the bubbletop. A built 348 with two fours or four webers and a 5/6 speed manual would be interesting. I loathe the top that extends past the rear window, reminded me of a aircraft carrier deck.

    Like 0
  8. Glenn ReynoldsMember

    Nice. Only thing i would add is the stainless trim kit for the B pillar and window surrounds. Makes a world of difference.

    Like 2
    • Chuck Dickinson

      You’d have to find it off another division’s 2 dr sedan since Chevy never offered that trim ‘upgrade’ as did Pont, Olds and Buick–at least they did on their 4 dr sedans.

      Like 1
      • Glenn ReynoldsMember

        Thanks, I thought they all did. My folks had a 59 Pontiac Catalina 2 door with post and trim. Looked the business.

        Like 1
  9. Kirk M Stankiewicz

    I own a 1960 Biscayne 235 3 on the tree 2 door sedan. Im 62 and it is similar to my first car that was a hand-me-down from my girl cousins. Drive it every day. I remember there were many of these cars on the road in the late 60’s- and now I rarely see one up here in the Northeast. Mine came from LA and did not have the death rot. It gets love and comments everywhere I go. The 1960 Chev is a beautiful car!

    Like 4
    • Donald Sieger

      I agree! I had a turquoise 2dr post six stick 60 Chevy and I loved it! They were so wide, I could easily fit six people in it, was great for dating too.

      Like 0
  10. Peter K.

    Had 2 of these in the early seventies. Paid$65 for one and $100 for the other Great cruising cars. If I had the money I’d buy this one!!!

    Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Barn Finds