Tidy Survivor: 1984 Chevrolet Camaro Berlinetta

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

If you wanted your Camaro to have a touch of luxury about it in 1984, then you really needed to look no further than the Camaro Berlinetta. Chevrolet did not shy away from the fact that they were trying to increase the appeal of the Camaro to both the more wealthy potential customers, whilst also producing a model that might appeal more readily to female buyers. Was this strategy a success? I think that the figures tell the story on that front because a total of 33,400 people decided to park a Berlinetta the same as our feature car in their driveway in 1984. This figure was far lower than Chevrolet had hoped, especially given the fact that total sales for that year reached 261,591 cars across the entire Camaro range. This fairly tidy example is located in Collegeville, Pennsylvania, and has been listed for sale here on eBay. The auction, which is a No Reserve listing, has been set to open at $2,000. There have been no bids up to this point, and there are currently 25 people who are watching the auction.

Finished in its original White, the Camaro is a tidy looking car. Tackling the bad news first, there is some rust for the next owner to consider. However, this is limited to the inside of the hood, so addressing it is not what I would consider as being a major problem that would require immediate attention. This could potentially be repaired, but given the fact that replacement steel hoods are available for around $210, buying one of those would probably be the best path for the next owner to follow. The rest of the car is said to be rust-free, while the paint looks good enough to respond well to a clean and polish. All of the distinctive Berlinetta pinstriping remains in place, although some of this has sustained some slight damage over the years. The alloy wheels look like they might also present nicely if treated to a thorough clean and detail, while there are no signs of any issues with the glass.

While the exterior of the Berlinetta was quite subdued, with little more than distinctive wheels and some very subtle stripes providing hints of what it was, the interior must have seemed like something straight out of Star Trek for potential buyers in 1984. The seats featured luxurious cloth upholstery, but it was the dash that gave the game away. The standard Camaro gauges made way for an electronic display with a bar-graph tachometer and digital speedometer. In addition, the radio was mounted in a pod that swiveled to allow both the driver and the front-seat passenger to clearly see and access the controls. The tan and black combination inside this vehicle looks really nice, and there aren’t many problems to be found here. It looks like there might be a single stain on the rear seat, while the carpet is starting to show some signs of fading. The rear cargo area is in quite remarkable condition because this is one area that can really cop some abuse with unrestrained items dancing around from side-to-side during cornering. The rest of the upholstery is in great order, and as is the case with the car’s exterior, there is nothing inside the Camaro that requires urgent attention. In a 1984 context, the Berlinetta does come quite nicely equipped. It features air conditioning, power windows, power locks, power seats, cruise control, and an AM/FM stereo radio/cassette player.

For those of you who were banking on finding a V8 under the hood of this Camaro, I’m afraid that the news isn’t great. However, I guess there is also the possibility that it could have been a whole lot worse. The Camaro was available with a 4-cylinder engine in 1984, but the Berlinetta was spared the ignominy of finding itself equipped with that. Instead, the entry-level engine was the 173ci V6, producing 107hp. That is what we find hiding under the hood of this particular car. This is backed by a 4-speed automatic transmission, while power steering and power brakes would also have helped the Berlinetta to appeal to its target demographic. Naturally, such a combination wasn’t going to make the Camaro much of a threat at the nearest drag strip. A ¼ mile ET of 19.3 seconds is pretty pedestrian, but then again, with softer suspension as part of the overall package, this was a vehicle that was more about style than performance. This particular Berlinetta has been sitting largely unused for the past 3-years, and while the owner says that it runs and drives well, he does admit that the engine will occasionally stall. He suspects that it is either bad fuel or a problem with the carburetor. With that in mind, a fuel system flush and a carburetor rebuild would probably be a pretty wise move.

This 1984 Camaro Berlinetta appears to be a clean survivor that needs very little work to return it to its absolute best. The relative rarity of these cars when new, coupled with natural attrition, means that they don’t come onto the market as often as other versions from the same model year. However, this particular car misses out in two main areas that will undoubtedly hurt its ultimate value. The original owner didn’t order the car with the optional T-Top, which was one of the more desirable features available at that time. However, it is the lack of a V8 under the hood which will be the major sticking point for potential buyers. Of course, rectifying that by slotting something altogether more potent into the engine bay is always a possibility. So, would you do that, or would you leave the Berlinetta untouched to preserve its originality?

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. Todd FitchStaff

    Nice find and write-up, Adam. I had forgotten some of the cool features of the interior. As you mention some of these Third Gens could be 4, 6, or 8 cyl, and they all looked nearly identical. A standard Camaro with the 5.0 would only have a little “5.0 HO” sticker in the rear bumper trim. With a five-speed and gears those (84-85s?) made a sweet sleeper, and they still would today. Thanks for the memories!

    Like 5
    • CJinSD

      In 1984, the L69″HO” V8 was automatic only and the 305 available with the 5-speed had 150 hp. A stripped one might have been a sleeper 35 years ago, but pretty much everything on the road today is faster than any of them. Also less sporty looking. By 1989, I was dusting these cars during my lunch hour with an ex-Chrysler-executive-fleet Dodge Caravan Turbo from the used car lot. That was a sleeper in 1989, but today nobody would realize you were in a hurry unless the head-gasket let go.

      I wish GM could still come up with designs like this one, but it wasn’t a very exciting time for Detroit performance technology in the grand scheme

      Like 1
  2. Moparman MoparmanMember

    I always thought that this generation Camaro looked naked without the spoiler to visually offset that massive under bite of a bumper! Good that the electronics are shown to be functional. Looks like a nice entry car for someone! GLWTA! :-)

    Like 3
  3. Sherminator

    My brother traded in his late 80s 4-cylinder Pinto for a new 6-cylinder Berlinetta in 1984. That Ford, with all its rust-related aerodynamic issues, including holes through the footwells in back, was a rocket compared to that ‘sports coupe’ with a boat anchor engine. I can’t imagine the emissions strangled V-8 was much better with all that weight those Camaros were carrying around.

    Like 0
    • JoeNYWF64

      Imagine how slow it would be fully loaded with the 4 cylinder! lol
      This gen was a lot lighter in weight, tho, than the previous generation & MO looks better w/o a rear spoiler than the prev gen looked w/o one.

      Like 1
  4. jerry z

    The instrument panel on these cars were strange! I don’t even think the Z28 came with this IP. Too bad there is no photos of the under carriage. Being the car is in PA might show some rust other than the hood.

    Like 0
  5. Vin_in_NJ

    The Berlinetta for 1984-1986 was also known as the Starship Camaro, due to telescoping control pods on each side of the steering wheel, and a free standing, rotating radio and cassette player. It had other Berlinetta only features that were not available on other Camaros. A car like this should be preserved. It is an example of when GM shyed away from the traditional cookie-cutter option packages and built something unique to other models.

    Like 3
  6. AndyinMA

    I had a 79 Berlinetta that did not make it past ’84 when a Lemans hit it broadside. When these came out I was just astounded, I wanted one so bad. Given the issues I have heard about, I’m glad I never was able to get one. (My GM come to Jesus moment was my 91 z34)
    Anyhow the looks of this generation F-body have held up well.

    Like 1
  7. Keith

    I like the silver Gen 4 Camaro in the back ground better, they were much more improved over the Gen 3’s.

    Like 0
  8. Jay

    T tops rattle and leak

    This is better

    Like 1
    • PRA4SNW

      My ’99 T-Tops never leaked or rattled.
      Secured in the trunk, it was a great way to spend a sunny day.

      Like 0
  9. delaware_doug

    Another unique feature of the 3rd gen Berlinettas was NO turn signal stalk, just a wide flat toggle on the dash pod.

    Like 1
  10. Daved

    If it looks like that under the hood then I don’t want to see the undercarriage. Hard pass on this one. Even if it had the ultra-desirable T-tops 😭

    Rustbelt owners should only be allowed to drive disposable Toyotas and Hondas in the winter

    Like 0
  11. robh693

    Ahh, the scent of Paco Rabanne still permeates the air surrounding that 1980’s time capsule.

    Like 0
  12. Chuck

    Us younger guys didn’t like them when they came down the assembly line. The girls did, and the old men would buy them for their wives and daughters. Of course we had the opportunity to build the ‘Z’s and Irocs, so this was a nice dainty.

    Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Barn Finds