
Ford introduced the Ranchero in 1957 as a pickup based on the company’s 2-door station wagon. They shifted gears in 1960 and built the Ranchero on the new Falcon compact platform through 1965. This seller has a ’64 Ranchero that appears to have been sitting for a long time (doesn’t run). Its claim to fame may be a more recent 351 cubic-inch V8 (not offered until 1969). Located in an open lot in Federal Heights, Colorado, this “Ute” (aka utility coupe) is available here on craigslist for $3,300 OBO. Mike F., thanks for another tip from yesteryear!

Because the 1960-65 Rancheros were Falcons under the skin, year-over-year changes followed those of the base car. Since the Falcon got its first big restyle in 1964, so did the Ranchero. The body lines were less rounded and more pointed, having little impact on sales. 17,000 or so of the pickups were cranked out in 1964 and were outsold by a lot by the revived Chevrolet El Camino, which was now a mid-size based on the all-new Chevelle. Ford would decide to go that route, too, in 1966 by switching up the Ranchero to a Fairlane chassis.

While we’re told the unibody on this Ranchero is straight, there is evidence of rust in the quarter panels and possibly the bed. The silver paint is also past its prime, so an extreme cosmetic makeover is in order. Since some of the tires are flat, the Ford has likely been sitting out on gravel for some time. That may have added to whatever headaches you may find.

Since this Ranchero has five-lug wheels and front fender badges, it was surely built with a 260 or 289 cubic inch V8. But a 351 “Windsor” is there now, and it once sported a fair amount of bling along with a 4-barrel carb. A 4-speed manual probably replaced a 3-speed from 1964. The mileage is stuck at 72,000, but that’s because the odometer is broken. We don’t see much of the interior other than a pair of aftermarket or incorrect bucket seats, condition unknown. Is this a “Falcon” you would restore?




The ad lacks detail, but the car has enough potential that it’s worth a look if you live within reasonable driving distance.
Steve R
Restoration is not the word I would use. Rehabilitation sounds better to my ears.
This car/truck would be a nice run about cleaned up and road worthy. Metal patching would be nice in the rear fenders, with attendant primer, but I would put more attention it to its road worthiness for driving.
Spend money sensibly. There have been so many ‘projects’ here on BF that were started as ‘restorations’ but were only stripped or disassembled to a point and then just languished … Make it road worthy, get it back on the road! With that 351w & 4sp.
Cool Ford. Deserves to do what it was built for. Driving!
No trailer queens or gassers please.
The taillight lenses look like they’re from 1965.
Yes, 1965 Falcon taillights are better looking.
That’s not rust that’s patina. Interesting how that 351 just slots right in there.
Remember the Fords Windsor family of motors. The basic difference between a 260/289/302 & a 351 is 1” of deck height. Easy swap.
The 351 is wider too.
Steve R
351, 4 spd., not an obvious rust bucket? At $3,300, how is it still available?
I’ve always wanted to build a Falcon Sprint Ranchero and at least this one has the right 5 lug rear end, and a 351. I’d begin upgrading suspension and brakes. Still lots of work but it’s fairly priced. Can’t believe it’s not already gone.