Droptop Driver: 1962 Studebaker Lark Regal Convertible

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

It’s a good problem to have, but there are simply too many cars in the world that I like. In idle conversation with my lovely bride, I’ve often floated the idea of keeping one car “in rotation,” or in other words, buying it at the beginning of driving season and selling it at the end. That would be to the detriment of the rest of my fleet, because I’d feel the need to spend as much time as I could with that car before I passed it on. I’m simply too sentimental to foster cars. If I had a completely different personality void of any attachment to machinery, this ’62 Lark Convertible would be high on my list of fun summer classics. Reader Tony Primo found it listed for $12,500 on craigslist near Chicago, but there’s a much more detailed ad on the website for the local chapter of the Studebaker Drivers Club, as a member is posting it for the owner, who is selling it due to illness. It’s a well-maintained driver with a well-documented ownership history.

Anyone who loves cars knows that Studebaker was perennially in financial trouble, but they managed to do a lot with a little, and if anything, the Lark looked better in 1962 than it did when it was introduced in 1959 (and both were based on the landmark ’53 “Loewy” coupe). One sign that money was tight at Studebaker was the fact that they didn’t introduce an overhead-valve six cylinder until 1961. Called the “Skybolt Six,” it was based on the decades-old flathead (same bore, same stroke, 170-cubic-inch displacement), but the new cylinder head gave the little engine 22 more horsepower and better fuel economy to boot. This car had a replacement engine installed in 1987 (at 95,000 miles), but it’s only been driven about 5,000 miles since that time (the odometer has just rolled over).

*As a side note, remember that Chrysler didn’t introduce the Slant Six until 1960 and AMC still had a flathead six on the books inĀ 1965!

The Lark has the optional Borg Warner “Flight-O-Matic” transmission with its selector on the column. The SDC advertisement says that the interior “is by far the best part of the car,” and it does look like it’s ready to go (and kudos for the seller for vacuuming it out – they too often don’t!) The Lark was treated to a “frame-on” restoration in 1987 (ostensibly when the engine was replaced), when the car was treated to pages of NOS parts and a new paint job.

The club member who is selling the car has done an excellent job on the club website pointing out the car’s flaws and what he thinks needs to be done to make the Lark a safe driver. First and foremost, the tires have 1996 date codes (and one is older than that), so he recommends replacing them before doing anything else. He also points out that the lower fenders have rust bubbling through (a common Studebaker malady), but the hog troughs and floors are solid, as is the rest of the undercarriage (aside from surface rust). He shows pictures of the flaws in the paint and windshield, and it seems like an honest writeup done for an ailing friend.

I just love this trim little Lark, and it looks like such a fun summer driver. I hope someone can take it home and foster it, or perhaps turn it into their forever car.

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. angliagt angliagtMember

    I had a model of this that I got as an offer on a cereal box.
    It might have been a Post cereal,which would be ironic.It was
    moulded in Red,& I thought that it was just like the one Wilbur
    drove in Mr ED.

    Like 10
  2. Driveinstile DriveinstileMember

    This is one very sharp looking Lark. The colors are great. Totally agree with you Aaron, its a huge difference when the seller actually cleans the car out and vacuums it out, and takes the empty Coke bottles ( or Pepsi…… Take your pick). And they even have pictures!!! Hope it finds a great new home ( maybe in Aarons garage???)

    Like 6
  3. Jeff DeWitt

    That’s a nice Lark, and while it doesn’t have my favorite engine/transmission combination it should be very nice to drive.

    One quibble about the writeup. It was NOT based on the 53 coupe, those cars are the Hawks. This car was based on the 53 sedan.

    Like 8
    • Aaron TothAuthor

      Good to know, Jeff…mental note made!

      Like 1
    • bone

      But weren’t the frame and drivetrains of the coupe and sedan the same ?

      Like 0
      • Poppy

        Some overlap, but the wheelbases were vastly different. Coupes, Hawks, and most President/Land Cruiser sedans were 120.5, Pre-Lark sedans were 116″ and Lark types were generally 108.5″ or 113″ for the Cruiser 4-door sedan and Wagon. As Jeff mentioned, it was the ’55-’58 sedan body shell that was the basis for the Lark body (’53-’54 didn’t have wraparound windshields yet).

        Like 0
  4. stillrunners stillrunnersMember

    That is a nice seldom seen convert right there and worth the money if you want a little different car. Don’t let the “no parts available” crowd get ya – there are plenty of parts to go around. My 1962 convert does happen to be a Daytona with a 289/4sp an also out of the Chicago area making it to Texas sometime in the 70’s……sure wish I could have spoke to the owner before he passed….it was set up for racing.

    Like 4

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Barn Finds