While build quality has improved tremendously in the past few decades, every once in a while a car with “issues” sneaks out. As long as a car isn’t a reincarnation of “Christine” we usually put up with a few minor annoyances. Yet, if presented with an opportunity to purchase a vehicle that you knew had “quirks,” would you go through with the sale? Would you be even more tempted to take a chance if the car is a highly desirable collectible like this 1994 Taurus SHO for sale on Craigslist in Lakewood, Washington? A person of few words is selling this handsome blue SHO if the lack of information in the ad indicates their verbal parsimoniousness. One cryptic line, however, hints at something ominous. The seller states that the car “Has few quirks.” With an asking price of $1,600 for this rare road rocket, do you even care about these quirks? Thanks to Rocco B. for the tip on this special Taurus!
Sometimes automakers can surprise you. Take for example Ford and its ubiquitous Taurus. Introduced in late 1985 as a 1986 model, the Taurus replaced the LTD and also represented a major shift in design and manufacturing quality for the automaker. These mid-sized sedans were a home run when introduced and product planners were eager to chase niche markets with the Taurus and its Mercury Sable stablemate. The first major variant of the Taurus was the Taurus SHO. In 1984, Ford and Yamaha Motor Corporation inked a deal where Yamaha provided a special version of the Ford Vulcan V-6. That special engine would boast four valves per cylinder, an increased compression ratio, and numerous heavy-duty parts to accommodate the substantial increase in the car’s horsepower and torque output.
The SHO was available to customers during the first three generations of the Taurus. Then, it was put to bed for eleven years before returning in 2010. By the time the SHO exited the market yet again in 2019, Americans had largely turned their back on four-door sedans due to their new-found infatuation with SUVs. Still, the last SHOs were a force to be reckoned with on the streets. Its twin-turbocharged V-6 had 365 horsepower, and all of it was pushed through a four-wheel drive system held up by a world-class suspension. The car had come a long way since the early eighties, but customers rarely gave the last SHO a second look. This ending was not much different than the car’s history. Sales never met expectations, despite the considerable development expense and the car’s undeniable performance advantages over its more pedestrian stablemates.
The 1994 Ford Taurus SHO seen here is one of the second-generation models. While the SHO was a niche vehicle, Ford felt that only offering a manual transmission hampered sales. Given what we know now about the not-so-gradual reduction in the percentage of drivers proficient in shifting a manual, the Ford marketing department made a smart move. They corrected the oversight by offering a 3.2-liter 220-horsepower engine in conjunction with a four-speed automatic transmission in 1993. Changes were few and far between in the later half of the car’s run except for the wheels seen on the featured car in the ad. Nicknamed “Slicers,” these distinctive wheels were directional, mandating a different pair of wheels for the left and right sides of the car.
While the pictures reveal a rough spot in the passenger rear fender, the rest of the car is in very good shape for its age and the fact that it has traveled over 179,000 miles. The interior is in especially fine shape for a car with this many miles. The seller tells us that it runs and drives well and has newer Pirelli tires. There is also the matter of the line in the ad that says that the car “has few quirks.” One would imply that there is an “A” missing. If so, it would be nice to know what those quirks are. With an asking price of $1,600, it might be worth putting up with a few quirks. That is bottom dollar for any running car these days, much less one that has value as a collectible and can haul the mail if you push your right foot to the floor.
Do you have any idea what the mysterious quirks might be in this car? Would you take a chance for $1,600? Please share your thoughts in the comments.
Bob thoughts on this gen ?
Yours w the stuck shift is still my favorite. But like Bennett said the last model offered was a true awd rocket 🚀
*Stick shift lol. I get stuck though sometimes..especially that downshift from 5 to 4, hi-lo. 😲 🚚
Good write-up Jeff.
Since you asked Stan…
Like Jeff says, other than the rear fender ding, it doesn’t look bad. For me the manual transmission is integral to the fun this car provides, but other folks may be fine with the automatic. I would also assume that it “has A few quirks”, but why not list them? Is it, the engine is about to expire, or is it that the dome light doesn’t work? In any case, it’s so cheap I hope someone steps up and gives it some attention.
If I recall these engines need a valve adjustment every 70-80k miles. Impressive that car has 179k. Engine rebuild in order?
Wonder if it’s ever had a clutch replacement ,you don’t just do that in the attached garage and couple beers,to anybody that’s R&R one before will know what I’m talking about.
Yeah, I think the clutch as been replaced . . .
That bullet hole in the rear fender gives this SHO some street cred.
I always liked the Yamaha engine more than the car itself. Ford should’ve stuck it in the Mustang and reinforced the “SVO” moniker.
IIRC, someone was dropping these engines into the middle of a Festiva, but really, that created a whole new car, more like a Renault R5 Turbo.
I think it was Jerry Titus’ son? Neat little road rocket!
I had a Black ’89 and a Blue ’95 (bought new) both 4 speeds. At around 100,000 miles, the ’95 crank position sensor failed, which took a while diagnose. I sold the ’95 with 105,000 miles with the original brake pads intact, driven pretty hard, but ready for more!
I’ve owned 2 of these SHOs both automatics. My wife loved these cars. Its probably ready for the big and expensive maintenance . Just remember that the serpentine belt tensioner is not available and the last time I checked which was over 10 years ago nobody made them after market. Had to replace one in the last one I had and there was a SHO yard in Washington state that had one and I mean one. The automatic and standard shift take different ones. I sold it soon after my wife wanted a newer car but she’s never been happy because of the performance of the SHO.
I owned a green 1994 from 1997 until about 2003. It was a 5 speed and a real sleeper, but I did have to spend some money on it, including a clutch which was not cheap and an AC compressor. Possibly timing belts although I can’t be completely sure. Seems like I also had some shock absorber problems, also the controls for the sunroof and worn out leather on drivers seat. This car was less troublesome than the turbo Thunderbird I had before that, and about on a par with the MINI S I had later. All in all, these cars were more troublesome than Toyotas, Volvos and Hyundais I have owned, but they were also a lot more fun (when running right)…
Decent condition for this high mileage collector but 16 hundred bucks. Hey it might be haunted. Don’t laugh my sister’s house was haunted. We used to laugh about it before she sold it.
Have a ’92 now and previously owned an ’89 & another ’92. All 5 speed versions …my current car has been used to teach 4 teenagers to drive a ‘stick’.
Adding Koni(s) and a Quaife posi + sway bars pretty much remedies any SHO “quirks” which were caused by the engine being more capable than the chassis. O/A SHOs are terrific values and, very popular at Radwood shows in particular.They actually are aging better than I had anticipated with many teenagers today wondering “what is that cool car”?