Typically, we feature numerous 1967 vintage Dodge Chargers and Coronets, as well as Darts to a lesser extent, here on BF. As for the big cars, like the C-body Monaco and Polara, not so much so. Today, let’s change things up a bit and review this ’67 Dodge Monaco 500, a tip courtesy of T.J. Cumberland, Wisconsin is where you’ll find this performance-oriented fullsizer, and it’s available here on Facebook Marketplace for $12,500.
The Monaco was a favored name for Dodge models from ’65 through ’78 and then again, spanning the years ’90 through ’92. In 1967, the Monaco 500, a two-door hardtop only, was the full-size zenith, followed by the lesser standard Monaco, which was offered as a four-door sedan, hardtop, station wagon, and a stylish two-door hardtop. Our subject can be considered rare, as there were only 2,500 Monaco 500s built in ’67! (I think the seller’s numbers are mixing the Monaco with the Monaco 500). What separated the Monaco 500 from the more pedestrian class was a standard 325 HP V8 engine, bucket seats, and a center console (a no-cost option), standard automatic transmission, a clock, a spare tire cover, courtesy lights, and badging.
This car’s hue appears to be Light Green Poly, and it’s still in good condition; perhaps without the deep shine it had at one time, but it’s very presentable as is the excessive lower body stainless trim. The seller is silent regarding this car’s past or its overall condition, so one will have to rely on the images or make contact for additional information.
The seller claims that this Monaco 500 is one of only 280 equipped with a 325 gross HP, 383 CI V8, though my research indicates that it was the standard engine in the Monaco 500 edition – two-barrel carburetor-equipped models need not apply (note my comment above about Monaco and Monaco 500 volumes). There’s no mention of running or driving characteristics, but we are told the engine has 102K miles of experience. A three-speed, TorqueFlite automatic transmission makes the rear wheel connection.
The bucket seat/center console interior is confusing. The front buckets are clad in black vinyl and cloth, but the back seat is done up in a tan fabric. The door panels couldn’t make up their mind and they’re wearing both shades. Whatever the case, the entire environment, including the dash pad and instrument panel are in nice shape. This is an A/C equipped car.
Styling is always subjective, and I’ll admit I don’t love this car’s lines. I don’t really dislike them either; it just doesn’t hit me right, though I am partial to that unique C-pillar. And that said, I think Dodge got the Monaco and Polara really right in ’69. This car’s calling card is its size, two-door body style, rear-wheel drive architecture, and big V8 engine – a combination of features that is virtually non-existent today. This one’s a good buy for anyone who wants to relive a time when these big domestic rigs were just everywhere. How about you? Like it, don’t like it, or somewhere in between?
Not for every MoPar fan but if this found its way to our house it’d be 100% welcomed and appreciated-especially when the family all went somewhere for the day! Install more seat belts and cruise wherever, but would probably need a couple Honda Pilots to guide this into a parking spot anywhere..
Big fun in a big car with big room and a decently big motor with all the accoutrements to enjoy floating along the interstate but keep that gas card for the clear gas pump nearby and handy.
100% Rex Kahrs approved!
I like this Dodge, a lot. One of the main reasons is, it seems you see more Plymouths and Chryslers, and not as many Dodges. (I like all 3). These Chryslers have a beautiful roof line, both the 4 door and 2 door Hardtops are very handsome cars. The ONLY change I’d make to this one, is a nice set of whitewalls. It’s also nice to see a full size Dodge with bucket seats and a console too. It makes this one even more unique.
Probably had to Frankenstein the interior with whatever donor parts could be found. I’d have no issue with this at all.
Could have left the factory that way, and either the selling dealer didn’t notice or didn’t want to fix it. My parents had a new ’71 Fury III that had a 383, but the car was built with a 6-cylinder’s radiator. Four different Chrysler-Plymouth dealers failed to diagnose the car’s overheating problem, but a independent radiator shop did. In the early ’90s, Car and Driver had a long-term test Mercury Tracer LTS in which it had one LTS front seat, and one base trim seat.
Wrong Craigie – standard interior on top of the line Mopars in all their makes in 1966/67 and beyond – the tilt/telescope is a not so common except in the Imperial line – I’ve had many. of those 1967/68.
Did I mention how I miss my 1967 Polara wagon ????
I think the interior was originally black and tan. The front buckets got recovered in black only but the backs of the front seats show ran. Again, not a big deal. I like these because you just don’t see a lot compared to the Chryslers. Dodges are just a little ugly but that’s part of their sinister appeal.
I loved these cars. The sculpting of the body lines was gorgeous, and something about those tail lights just tripped my trigger. I’d love to put this in my garage.
These yank tanks were the best overall vehicles ever built in America bar none!
More chrome and glitz than a Newport, and those fantastic bow-tie tail lights!
Funny….that thought had just occured to me some moments ago – I have a 1959 Chevy but my 1967 Polara wagon had seperate tailights….
It’s kind of hard to believe that the company that produced this…thing, came out with the beautiful ’68 Charger redesign only a year later.
cool looking and looks to be fairly clean. needs w/w tires though.
Mine was a 1968 Monaco…4door. Not what I was looking for in my mid 20s, but it rolled into a Chevy dealer where I had bought several cars before. The dealer didn’t want to mess with it so offered it to me at a great price. I drove it hard for four years. That 318 engine never gave me a spot of trouble while providing great milage, the whole car was as solid as a rock. This ’67 looks like it will do the same.
Personally I thought these were great looking cars. Overall this one looks really clean and that 383ci would get you where you want to go.
My information says the 67 Monaco has the 383 4-barrel motor as standard, and the 440 was optional. Additionally, it was available with TorqueFlight or a 4-speed transmission. In 68, the 383 came with a 2-barrel and torqueflight. Production of the Monaco 500 in 67 was around 2500 units. The Monaco had around 11,400 units built. It might be a little big for some, but this 67 would be a great cruiser as it sits.
I meant to say the 67 Monaco 500 has the 383-4-barrel standard – oops!
Pretty sure your correct on these #’s and yes these were on the Mopar C-Body platform – the big un’s…..
A buddy had one of these cars in the early 1980’s. It was dark red with a dark red interior, maybe burgundy or maroon, I don’t know the name of the paint color. It had buckets, but no console. It had a 4-speed and a 383-4 barrel. I loved that car. His was a hardtop. If I’m not mistaken, I think there were Monaco 500 convertibles too.
Nice car and I appreciate it, but these have the face of Ernest Borgnine. 🫤
“102,000 miles of experience” that’s awesome, I’ve never heard it that way before ! 😂