The First Generation Dodge Challenger is undeniably desirable, and pristine examples typically command impressive prices. This 1970 Challenger Convertible isn’t perfect, but it could be an excellent project candidate for those wishing to lift its presentation to a higher level. It features one of the most popular paint shades and appears to be largely unmolested. However, the biggest question facing potential buyers is whether the asking price is justified. The seller listed the Challenger here on eBay in Columbus, Ohio. They set their BIN at $45,000, meaning that it can’t be classified as affordable.
I always impress upon enthusiasts considering parting with a classic the need to list it with the best possible photos to paint their car in the most favorable light. Sadly, that isn’t the case with this 1970 Challenger Convertible. It deserves better, especially for a car within this price bracket. I have always considered Chrysler’s E-Body range, released for the 1970 model year, to be one of the best-looking to roll off an American production line. Even in its most basic form, these cars possess a muscular presence that is impossible to ignore. The original owner ordered this first-year Challenger Convertible in desirable Hemi Orange with a contrasting Black soft-top. The vehicle presents quite nicely as a survivor-grade classic, with no obvious significant paint or panel problems. The supplied images suggest that it is rust-free, but there is some news that might motivate some potential buyers to give this classic a wide berth. The seller acknowledges prior accident damage that impacted the left front, cowl, driver’s floor, and rear quarter panel. It is unclear when this occurred, but the included image supports the seller’s statement that the repairs are “less than exemplary.” Only an in-person inspection will determine whether they are genuinely acceptable, or if they require further work to reach that standard. The soft-top features its original glass, and the trim generally looks quite good.
Buyers ordering a 1970 Challenger Convertible faced a wide selection of engines, with this car’s original owner teaming the 318ci V8 with a three-speed manual transmission. The V8 produces 230hp and 320 ft/lbs of torque, providing performance that most would consider acceptable. However, those who are not focused on complete originality have plenty of available options if they desire more under their right foot. Squeezing extra power from the existing motor is relatively easy using off-the-shelf items like a different intake, carburetor, or headers, or by slotting in a more aggressive camshaft. A transplant is another option because bolting in a larger motor is pretty easy. Of course, the buyer could throw caution to the wind and install a Hemi for truly exhilarating performance. However, with this classic having a documented odometer reading of 31,700 genuine miles, the new owner might opt for preservation over modification. The seller describes this Convertible as fun to drive, and I see no reason to doubt that statement.
Assessing this Challenger’s interior is impossible because this is the best of the two interior images. That is why I mentioned photo quality earlier because the ones for this car tell us nothing beyond the fact that it is trimmed in Black vinyl. The seller added new seatbelts and stated that someone converted the driver’s window to power operation. Beyond that and the fact that there appears to be no carpet, your guess is as good as mine.
This 1970 Dodge Challenger Convertible is what many might consider a “swings and roundabouts” classic. The odometer reading is extraordinarily low, and it wears one of the most desirable paint shades. Both factors make it very attractive. However, the prior accident damage and repairs raise questions about what it might cost to address the obvious shortcomings to a higher standard. That brings us to the subject of the seller’s price, and whether it is justified. My instinct suggests it is optimistic, although the Watch List tally seems to indicate that this Challenger has generated interest. Would you be tempted, or will you pass on this classic?
Most definitely tempted
Its together.. not seeing rust..
A small v8.
A TURN KEY 🔑!
Yes it’s higher on price .. but buy it and drive it lightly to shows.
Enjoy and likely at least break even in future but ..
Who cares its a vert 70 !!!
Early Challengers are very attractive cars on the outside, but Mopar seemed to be having a contest for how much cheap black plastic and vinyl it could put into these cars’ interior.
Nice looking car, esp well set up. The 318/3sp was a nice combo. Really needs some better wheels, or at least full sized wheel covers. For the asking price, I think a new carpet could have been installed after showing the floors under the old ones. Also, needs decent interior shots. Why would you not show those, is there something to hide? What is the story here? I assume a quick flip after a good score at an estate auction.
I was not aware you could get a three speed manual in a Challenger. Why not go the bit extra and get the 4 speed if it was available with the 318?
Because the 4sp was over a 1000 dollar premium if adjusted for inflation. I am guessing that is why. Same reason why people today lament as to why people back 50 years ago didn’t buy more hemis. It was a dollar cost to benefit analysis. Besides, a 3sp isn’t all that much worse than a 4sp. Of course, if the cost was the same, we would all go the four speed, but money talks.
I know I had a 73 z28 with a four speed and of course it was extra when I ordered it. When I went to trade it in dealers were telling me no one will want that with a four speed. Did they think people that people were that dumb.
John, oddly, at least in ’73 & ’74, a 4 speed manual was std equip – in the T/A – & get this – NO EXTRA CHARGE for a turbo 400 automatic!
Back in ’81, my ’73 Challenger RT 340 had a 3sp stick/console, white on white.
Insurance……
1971 Indy pace car crash. The car was a ’71, but gave old John Glenn a ride he didn’t expect.
Nine floor and trunk metal on it but the seller did mention that left door…..I’m seeing a 1972 date code which isn’t a deal breaker but there would be your sign….on the high side but it already has the pedals and factory floor hump…
Other than the surface rust showing in the trunk and floor pans the new buyer is off to a great start. If the rust presents hard solid metal then sodablasting would be the way to go. GLWTS
Hi Joe
Very interesting. Back then they had a book they looked in and they could tell you whatever they wanted. I might have got changed extra when it wasn’t. At least when you build a vehicle on line now you can see how much extras cost.
But the extras today are a joke, compared to the colors inside & out & 50 or more separate distinct options available even on the cheapest cars back in the day.
Today on some new “cars” you may have to pay thousands extra just to get the ONE shade of blue or red(instead of white/grey/silver/black) that’s available! Back in the day you could choose from 4, if not 5 or even 6 shades of blue even on the cheapest cars for no extra charge! I bet no young driver today is aware of all the model choices & body styles & options that were available back in the day – let alone what a base car cost or even was.