Disclosure: This site may receive compensation when you click on some links and make purchases.

51K Mile 1987 Chevrolet Camaro

Do you ever notice the modern-day equivalent of a base model Ford Mustang or Chevrolet Camaro while in traffic? In other words, something along the lines an EcoBoost-equipped Mustang or a Camaro with the V6. Chances are, you wouldn’t, but perhaps a bone-stock example in mint condition will be somewhat sought after someday. That’s certainly the effect that this 1987 Chevrolet Camaro listed here on Craigslist has on us, as it’s a lowly V6-powered base spec, but its impressive survivor condition is worth noting. The seller is asking $10,200 for this near-spotless Camaro.

Thanks to Barn Finds reader Mitchell G. for the find. Now, while this entry-level Camaro may not be the muscular Z/28 that everyone wants, let’s not forget that the upscale version of Chevy’s predominant muscle car was not exactly a fire-breather at the time. Performance was suffering across the lineup and not just at GM; things weren’t much rosier at Ford, although they did have the turbocharged Mustang SVO at the time. The Camaro shown here is just 51K miles old and looks sharp, with battleship gray paint. The factory Rally wheels are in excellent condition.

The interior is beautiful, with cloth bucket seats that show very little wear and tear, and the same goes for the matching gray carpets. The seller notes that despite being a base model, the equipment list isn’t terrible, as the Camaro is equipped with air conditioning, power steering, brakes, and a decent factory stereo. The rest of the cockpit is pretty basic, with crank windows and manual locks. It does have the optional automatic transmission, which is the final box to check if you want the ultimate hairdresser’s spec Camaro. Ironically, the same stigma holds true today with entry-level Camaros and Mustangs, although the base model horsepower ratings have changed quite a bit.

The fuel-injected 2.8L V6 was good for about 135 horsepower when new, which places it squarely in economy car territory by modern standards. I actually think there’s an increasingly small amount of compact cars that aren’t making at least 150 horsepower these days, so times have changed quite a bit. But to my earlier point, we don’t often consider the entry-level Mustang or Camaro a model worth cherishing, and this almost guarantees that cars like this one will always grab our attention years later when you find one that was clearly loved. This Camaro was with the same owner through 2017, and hopefully, it will continue to be treated well in the years to come.

Comments

  1. CCFisher

    There’s an important difference between today’s entry-level pony cars and those from 1987. The 1987 Camaro featured here can run the 1/4 mile in around 18 seconds. Today’s entry-level Camaro can do it in under 14 seconds, faster than even the fastest 1987 Camaro available. The V8s will always get more attention, but there’s no such thing as a slow pony car anymore.

    Like 14
    • Melton Mooney

      More importantly…no cupholders in ’87.

      Like 8
    • skidmarc

      Exactly! I turned a 13.2 @105 last spring in my brand new bone stock 10 spd ecoboost. There wasn’t much in the 60’s that would turn those numbers. Today, a rental car goes that quick.

      Like 2
  2. Steve R

    Posting deleted by author. Good deals don’t last.

    Steve R

    Like 6
  3. Frank Drackman

    Had a 2021 Camaro as a Rental Car a few years ago, thought it was the V-6 since it was a Rental, but it was pretty quick, no trouble cruising at 80, and got 31mpg highway.
    Turns out it was a 4 Cylinder, rated at the same 275 HP as my 1994 Z28.
    Didn’t have the cool V-8 sound, and was an automatic instead of a 6 speed, but I never got more than 26mpg with the 94′.
    It didn’t have a Cassette Tape player either

    Frank

    Like 11
  4. Dan

    Drop a ls in it

    Like 4
  5. skidmarc

    In addition to my Ecoboost Mustang, I daily drive a base model 1996 4Runner with a 4 cyl and a 5 speed, It’s got 243K on it but it’s the cleanest 3rd gen 4Runner I’ve seen. Roll up windows, no power locks but it does have AC. I also bought a stripped 1991 F150 short bed 4×4 brand new. I love the base models cause I’m cheap!

    Like 1
  6. Elmo

    Imagine, if you will, an interior filled with acres and acres of squeaky, bland gray plastic…

    Like 2
  7. JD

    Hey Skid… My son has a 1995 4Runner, 4×4 that he loves, but alas, it’s engine is fading fast.
    Just curious because I saw you have a ’96, would you know of anyone in the southwestern states (we are in Vegas) who does engine swaps? It’s a 3.0… he’d like to go to a 3.4, but costs are a factor.
    Any advice on the ’95 would be greatly appreciated…
    JD

    Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Get new comment updates via email. Or subscribe without commenting.

Barn Finds