57k Original Miles: 1973 Ford Mustang Convertible

Disclosure: This site may receive compensation from some link clicks and purchases.

For the First Generation Mustang, the glory year was undoubtedly 1966. Ford couldn’t build cars fast enough in that year, with 607,568 buyers clamoring to park the iconic pony car in their driveway. From that high, sales volumes plummeted dramatically. By 1972, the total had dropped to 125,903 vehicles, but the badge rallied to 134,867 in 1973 as Ford announced that a new Mustang was waiting in the wings and undertook a more aggressive marketing campaign on the outgoing model. Our feature Convertible is from that final year of production and presents well as an original survivor. It has a couple of minor interior trim faults, but its overall presentation means the next owner could slip behind the wheel and drive this Mustang with pride. Located in Tyler, Texas, the seller has listed the Convertible for sale here on Craigslist. It could be yours by handing them $31,000. I have to say a big thank you to Barn Finder Larry D for using his finely-tuned radar to spot this classic for us.

If I were to pick a 1973 Mustang to park in my garage, I would probably bite the bullet and select a Convertible. This choice would stem purely from a styling perspective because I feel that the Convertible looks lighter than the Fastback or Coupe derivatives. It may be physically larger than earlier cars, but it seems to better reflect a “family” likeness than the other body styles from that year. It would also seem an odd choice for where I live because I would need to keep the Mustang for sunny days and have a second car on standby to drive during the other fifty-one weeks in the year! This Mustang wears Saddle Bronze Metallic paint, and since the owner doesn’t mention any prior restoration work, it could be original. It holds an impressive depth of color and shine, with no major blemishes or patchiness that can afflict metallic paint in locations with high UV levels. That physical location may also explain the lack of apparent rust. There are no issues visible in the supplied photos and no mention of problems in the seller’s listing. The description is light on information, so we know nothing about the state of the power top. However, the trim looks excellent for a vehicle of this age, and I can’t spot any flaws in the glass.

While Ford continued to offer a six-cylinder engine option in the 1973 Mustang, the original owner of this classic equipped it with a 302ci V8, three-speed automatic transmission, power steering, and power front disc brakes. With that V8 producing 135hp, it would take this Convertible 18.2 seconds to cover the ¼ mile. This aspect of the Mustang reveals how the car had evolved since the halcyon days of 1966. Emission regulations were strangling the humble V8 by 1973, but other factors were worth considering. A 1966 Mustang Convertible tipped the scales at 3,027lbs, but our feature car pushes that figure to 3,355lbs. Every additional pound would impact performance, and that’s without considering relative power outputs. The C-Code 302 pumped out 200hp in 1966. While I acknowledge that the early figures represented gross horsepower while manufacturers quoted net output by 1973, there was a measurable difference between the two V8s. Combining those factors makes it easy to see why the 1966 Convertible could gallop through the ¼ mile in 16.9 seconds versus the number previously quoted for our feature car. The seller supplies no information on how well this Convertible runs or drives, but its engine bay presents well for an original survivor of this vintage. Therefore, if the appearance serves as an accurate guide, the news should be positive. The seller also quotes an odometer reading of 57,000 genuine miles but fails to mention verifying evidence.

Considering this Mustang appears to have spent its life in Texas, its interior trim and upholstery have survived remarkably well. There are flaws and defects present, but they’re pretty minor. The driver’s seat has a spot of wear on the outer edge and a couple of seam separations, but these appear repairable. If the next owner seeks perfection, a pair of replacement covers in the correct color and pattern will lighten their wallet to the tune of $370. There are a couple of small splits on the door trim. Once again, replacements are readily available and retail for around $390 per pair. The rest of the interior looks good, with no other items showing significant deterioration. I am surprised that, given its physical location, the original owner didn’t equip the car with air conditioning. Then again, who needs it with the wind rushing through your hair? Comfort and convenience features appear limited to a remote driver’s mirror and a pushbutton AM radio.

This 1973 Mustang Convertible is a tidy survivor that needs little to lift its presentation to a higher level. As a survivor-grade classic, it is sure to turn heads in its current state. Although the asking price is heading towards the top end of what potential buyers might expect to pay, its condition and low odometer reading could justify the figure. By 1973, the Ford Mustang was a different creature from the one that so effectively captured the public’s imagination a few years earlier. It had grown larger and softer, appealing to potential buyers who prioritized comfort over outright performance. For some enthusiasts, it marked a sad end for such a groundbreaking model. Those individuals also feel the misunderstood Mustang II served to rub salt into the wound. However, that’s a story for another day.

Auctions Ending Soon

Comments

  1. RC Graham

    302, 2bbl, emissions low compression motor, automatic, no air. BTW – For all that ‘no performance’, the gas mileage began to suck, too.

    Love the way it looks, would bore me to death to drive.

    If you have a daughter who just turned 16 and lives in Maine or Nova Scotia, you may have just the ticket.

    Like 5
    • joenywf64

      With that kind of “performance” with the base V8, might have been better to get the lighter 250 strait 6 instead with a few options as possible- at least mpg would be reasonable.

      Like 1
  2. theagent39

    Ford should be ashamed to have manufactured such an ugly, low performance and bloated car in the 1970’s, hated them then and now

    Like 5
  3. aelia

    I used to drive a 2010 prius and it had exactly as many ponies as this car, and it was about 300lbs lighter. I’ll take an invitation to the nearest muscle car owner’s meet, thanks!

    Like 3
    • RC Graham

      @aelia – Sadly, neither your car nor the subject Mustang qualifies as a ‘muscle car’. No invitations for either. Come over a few weekends and help shoehorn a 460 Super CobraJet in, and you may qualify to ride shotgun. Once.

      P.S. – Don’t ever mention ‘Prius’ and ‘muscle… anything’ in the same breath. Consider this one time, your free pass.

      Like 14
    • Big Schwag

      Your joking right?

      Like 1
  4. Jonathan A. Green

    I have almost the exact same car, but a 351 Cleveland 2v, AC (doesn’t work), AM/FM stereo (replaced with a Retrosound and new speakers, so there’s Bluetooth for your music) and power windows. An Earl Scheib paint job, looks good at 10 feet…

    This car is not fast at all, but that’s missing the point.

    It’s an old car, parts are plentiful and cheap, any half a– mechanic can fix it, it’s relatively reliable, stops reasonably well, and you won’t have a heart attack if you put a nick in the paint. 4 seats (technically) so the family can go with you, an automatic so everyone can drive it. It’s not so fast that your kid (and he or she gets to drive it) will get into trouble.

    No one will resent you for driving this car. Mine is yellow, and it’s just a car that makes me and just about everyone happy. I was once at a gas station, when a woman in a Lambo Urus (sp?) pulled in, and went nuts, “Oh My God, I LOVE that car!! It’s my favorite color!! Can I take some pictures?”

    Like 19
  5. Howie

    This is mighty clean, but a bit high on price, seller has over 45 other vehicles listed.

    Like 3
  6. Billyray

    Good looking car!

    Like 2
  7. Nelson Helmutt

    In 73 I was a Lot boy at Don Sanderson ford in the rental lease dept.
    Had to wash these Girls cars. as by then that’s was what the Mustang became a Little Girls car. we had 2 Convertibles to rent. heck a 4 door maverick would wipe these Mustangs.

    Like 1
    • RC Graham

      @Nelson Helmutt – There are good people and not-so-good people. Sanderson, Paradise, Courtesy and Tex Earnhardt were / are good dealerships. Good people.

      In a comment tangent to yours: recently, I owned a 2006 Pontiac Solstice. It was stunningly beautiful in Bright Yellow / Black leather, and the optional, chromed wheels.

      It was OK to drive, the mileage was OK, too. But it wasn’t either quick or fast. I was assembling a Turbocharger kit for it to rectify the situation, when I got smoked by a 4-door Camry! It then occurred to me that I could get most of the performance I wanted with the turbo, but why? There was a factory turbocharged version already, and I would just be re-inventing the wheel. As an old hot rodder, that just rankled.

      I sold it to a girl, who loved it. (Did I mention how pretty it was?)

      Subsequently, I bought my 5th Corvette, and now I too love my car.

      Square peg, round hole.

      There is somebody who will just love this pretty Mustang.

      Like 3
  8. PRA4SNW

    GONE.

    If the seller got the asking price, they made out like a bandit!

    Like 0
  9. theGasHole

    I drove a 72 convertible for most of my college years in Montana in the mid 1990’s. Fortunately I had the 351C which had enough oomph to get up and go. $35k seems steep for a 302 and I can’t say i’ve ever seen those rims on a 71-73 before, but looks like it sold already so someone was wanting it!

    Like 1
  10. gearjammer

    Very nice car! Caught my eye immediately. Then I saw the yellow key tag and knew it was for sale by a dealer, and that immediately turned me off. I knew right away the car wasn’t worth the asking price.

    Like 0

Leave A Comment

RULES: No profanity, politics, or personal attacks.

Become a member to add images to your comments.

*

Barn Finds