It is fair to say that the Mustang II spent decades in the classic wilderness, largely ignored by those preferring the performance and styling offered by earlier and later vehicles. However, time change, and the Mustang II has grown legs in the market for buyers seeking an affordable pony car. Our featured Ford is a relatively rare 1977 Mach 1 that presents exceptionally well following a restoration around fifteen years ago. I must say a big thank you to Barn Finder Mitchell G. for spotting this turnkey gem listed here on eBay in Fairfield, Pennsylvania. The seller set their BIN at $16,000 with the option to make an offer.
Ford launched the Mustang II for the 1974 model year and, like the car it replaced, the company based its latest offering on fairly humble underpinnings. For the First Generation, it was the Falcon, but Ford chose the Pinto as the foundation for its new pony car. Some people struggled to warm to the concept of an iconic badge powered by a four, while the styling also divided opinions. However, buyers voted with their wallets, and the Mustang II sold in respectable numbers, justifying the development costs. Our feature car rolled off the line in 1977 as a relatively rare Mach 1 version. It has led an interesting life, this being the second time that it has found its way into the seller’s garage. They chose to perform a thorough restoration in 2010, massaging the panels to arrow straightness before applying a fresh coat of Vista Orange. It has survived remarkably well, with no evidence of major steel or paint defects. I can’t spot any evidence of rust, and the seller doesn’t mention problems in their listing. The trim and glass are in good order, as are the alloy wheels.
Timing can make an enormous difference in the automotive world, and Ford was probably more aware than any manufacturer of how to get it right or wrong. The Edsel fits into the latter category, while the original Mustang lands firmly in the former. The same is true of the Mustang II, which appeared on showroom floors as the Arab Oil Embargo unfolded. Fuel prices rose, shortages were common, and buyers focused on efficiency as a prime consideration when assessing the worth of a new car to park in their garage. The Mustang II was not only significantly smaller than the car it replaced, but could be ordered with a 2.3-liter four under the hood. Our feature Mach 1 left the factory in 1977, ordered by the first owner with a venerable 302ci V8, a four-speed manual transmission, and power assistance for the steering and brakes. There wasn’t a lot to get excited about, because while the engine possessed the unmistakable exhaust note of a V8, its power and torque figures of 129hp and 242 ft/lbs hardly set pulses racing. However, this beauty will undoubtedly improve upon those numbers. The engine block is original, but sports a range of new and updated parts, including new aluminum cylinder heads, pistons, valves, roller rockers, and an Edelbrock camshaft. The aluminum intake is from the same manufacturer, topped by a Holley 600cfm carburetor. I think we can forget 129hp, because I suspect that the output of this 302 might double that. The build process included a thorough inspection of the transmission for wear and other issues. Purists will welcome the news that any removed original parts are included, but I suspect that most potential buyers would consign them to a dark and dusty corner of their workshop. We receive no specific information about how the Mach 1 runs or drives, but I see no reason why the news shouldn’t be positive.
I get the impression that this Mustang II may have led a sheltered existence, because while the seller admits to replacing the front seatcovers during their build, they state that the rear cover is original. Finding anything to fault is seemingly impossible, with the Black vinyl trim in great condition, complemented by dazzling Orange highlights that mimic the exterior paint shade. The carpet looks spotless, the pad is crack-free, and the plastic hasn’t cracked or crumbled. The driver faces a sports gauge cluster through the sports wheel, and an aftermarket FM converter feeds signals to the factory AM radio.
The Mustang II didn’t simply share some of its styling cues with its predecessor, because it was another example of the right car being in the right place at the right time. In its launch year, 296,041 buyers parked a Mustang II in their garage, marking it as a sales success. However, like its predecessor, those numbers would drop in subsequent years as cars like the Toyota Celica made inroads on showroom floors. The 1977 tally of 153,173 vehicles remained quite healthy, but only 6,719 buyers were prepared to pay the premium for the Mach 1 version. This is one of those cars, and its presentation is hard to fault. Its performance should be significantly improved courtesy of the engine upgrades, although the included original parts could allow the buyer to return the car to its factory form. The Malaise Era was a miserable time automotively, and this beauty would address some of the criticism leveled at vehicles from the period. That’s why I would leave this gem as-is. Do you agree?
Still like these for what they are
It is still common misnomer that these were based on the pinto when they were not. The article below explains it very well even stating that they had less in common with a Pinto than the original did with the Falcon.
https://www.hagerty.com/media/car-profiles/ford-mustang-ii/
I agree. I don’t get where the idea came from that the Mustang II was based on the Pinto.
It has always been thought that ot was based on the Pinto. I remember back when it was new everyone in High School said it was just a Pinto.
Like Gerry said, the Mustang II is not based on the Pinto. They are completely different platforms. Somehow, in the hobby this misconception lingers. Otherwise, very good write-up Adam, highlighting how it \was the right car for its day.
I too like Mustang Ii’s. I prefer them completely stock, but this one looks like a nice example which has had some upgrades . Being essentially economy cars from the dark days of the 70’s, few survive; It is uncommon to see them, in any condition.
Nice II w the 302 and manual. 😎
As is. Fair deal. I’d drive it.( and I’m picky.)
A smog strangled 302 can definitely be coaxed into doing the right thing! A righteous Mustang II. GLWTA
I’ll definitely keep that in mind, when I cut the catalytic converters off my F150. Want to know why guys in the 60’s paid $4000 for their big block Road Runners? And you pay $55,000 for a Challenger? Govt overreach.
Not my choice of colour..lol..but it looks to be the factory colour going by the interior trim so should be kept as such.I have always been a Mustang II fan and it took very little money to turn a high 17 low 18 second QM into a healthy 15 back in the day,these cars were a perfect platform for fun.
Not pinto based as others have posted
Given he has most the original parts (hopefully the original wheels, too!), this looks like a pretty good deal. Nice condition. Put it back to stock, and you’d have quite a slow stopper.
My wife had a Ghia 302 auto when we got married. Similar exterior color but a tan interior. I liked it, but she wanted front wheel drive, so it was traded in on a ’84 Chevy Cavalier. I think people came up with the Pinto story as a way to disparage the Mustang 2. And of course Pintos explodes if you looked at them cross eyed, LOL!
Well, same suspension design with control arms, steering rack and other items like engines, transmissions, etc. The comparison is not unwarranted. I believe that structurally the Mustang II was a stronger car. However my experience with these havingvbeen driven on the crappy Illinois roads was that the same suspension components on the Pinto held up reasonably well. Where the Mustang II some components did not. (Most likely due to the additional vehicle weight) We used to refer to Mustang IIs as 40 lbs of s__t in a 10 lb. bag. That being said, I have always liked the body style of these. The bumpers, not so much. I have actually looked for these when I had an extra 5.0 laying around.
am i the only one who thinks the drivers door is way out of line or sagging ?
I agree Anthony, I’m betting worn door hinges. Still a straight looking car.
Quoted from Wikipedia.The Mustang II was 490 lb (222 kg) lighter and almost 19 in (483 mm) shorter than the 1973 Mustang, and derived from the subcompact Pinto platform. While sharing a limited number of driveline components with the Pinto, the Mustang II employed an exclusive subframe, isolating its front suspension and engine mount subframe. The steering used a rack-and-pinion design
Lovely looking car. I know some people assume that the Mustang II was a dressed up Pinto. Where did that assumption come from? Were there some parts of the Mustang II that were based on the Pinto?
Yes, several control arms, steering rack, wheels and some brake parts. Mustang II was heavier duty, particularly in the front cross member/mount which was/could be un-bolted where the Pinto was one piece with the body shell. Drive train options were naturally the same. (Except the V8)
Okay.